Background Despite its established benefits, palliative care (PC) is rarely utilized for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients. We sought to examine transplant physicians’ perceptions of PC. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of transplant physicians recruited from the American-Society-for-Blood-and-Marrow-Transplantation. Using a 28-item questionnaire adapted from prior studies, we examined physicians’ access to PC services, and perceptions of PC. We computed a composite score of physicians’ attitudes about PC (mean=16.9, SD=3.37) and explored predictors of attitudes using a linear mixed model. Results 277/1005 (28%) of eligible physicians completed the questionnaire. The majority (76%) stated that they trust PC clinicians to care for their patients, but 40% felt that PC clinicians do not have enough understanding to counsel HSCT patients about their treatments. Most endorsed that when patients hear the term PC, they feel scared (82%) and anxious (75%). Nearly half (45%) reported that the service name ‘palliative care’ is a barrier to utilization. Female sex (β=0.85, P=0.024), having <10 years of clinical practice (β=1.39, P=0.004), and perceived quality of PC services (β=0.60, P<0.001) were all associated with a more positive attitude towards PC. Physicians with a higher sense of ownership over their patients’ PC issues (β=−0.36, P <0.001) were more likely to have a negative attitude towards PC. Conclusions The majority of transplant physicians trust PC, but have substantial concerns about PC clinicians’ knowledge about HSCT and patients’ perception of the term ‘palliative care’. Interventions are needed to promote collaboration, improve perceptions, and enhance integration of PC for HSCT recipients.

Barriers and facilitators to adoption of results of clinical trials are substantial and poorly understood. We sought to examine whether the results of the randomized, multicenter Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 0201 study comparing peripheral blood (PB) with bone marrow (BM) stem cells for unrelated donor (URD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) changed practice from PB to BM graft utilization and explored factors that impact graft selection and translation of research results into practice. The difference between use of URD BM and PB in the 2 years before and after publication of results in 2012 was examined using observational data collected by the Center for Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. A web-based survey of transplant physicians was conducted to understand the change in physician-reported personal and center preferred URD graft. No significant change in use of BM versus PB grafts occurred after 2012. Both BMT CTN participating and nonparticipating centers continued to use PB. Ninety-two percent of respondents were aware of the study results; 18% reported a change in personal and 16% reported a change in their center's practice of requesting BM instead of PB for URD HCT. Patient characteristics and the perception that engaging local champions to increase the evidence uptake were factors associated with personal or center change in practice. Despite awareness of the trial results, fewer than one-fifth of HCT physicians reported practice change in response to the BMT CTN 0201 results. Observational data confirmed no discernible change in practice.

The primary aim of this study was to describe healthcare costs and utilization during the first year after a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for privately insured non-Medicare patients in the United States (US) aged 50-64 years who were treated with either chemotherapy or chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). MarketScan (Truven Health Analytics) adjudicated total payments for inpatient, outpatient and prescription drug claims from 2007-2011 were used to estimate costs from the health system perspective. Stabilized inverse propensity score weights were constructed using logistic regression to account for differential selection of alloHCT over chemotherapy. Weighted generalized linear models (GLM) adjusted costs and utilization (hospitalizations, inpatient days and outpatient visit-days) for differences in age, sex, diagnosis year, region, insurance plan type, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) and 60-day pre-diagnosis costs. Because mortality data were not available, models could not be adjusted for survival times. Among 29,915 patients with a primary diagnosis of AML, a total of 985 patients met inclusion criteria (774 [79%] receiving chemotherapy alone and 211 [21%] alloHCT). Adjusted mean one-year costs were $280,788 for chemotherapy and $544,178 for alloHCT. Patients receiving chemotherapy alone had a mean of 4 hospitalizations, 52.9 inpatient days and 52.4 outpatient visits in the year following AML diagnosis; patients receiving alloHCT had 5 hospitalizations, 92.5 inpatient days and 74.5 outpatient visits. Treating AML in the first year after diagnosis incurs substantial health care costs and utilization with chemotherapy alone and with alloHCT. Our analysis informs health care providers, policy makers and payers so they can better understand treatment costs and utilization for privately-insured patients age 50-64 with AML.

There is an increasing need for the development of approaches to measure quality, costs and resource utilization patterns among allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients. Administrative claims data provide an opportunity to examine service utilization and costs, particularly from the payer’s perspective. However, because administrative claims data are primarily designed for reimbursement purposes, challenges arise when using it for research. We use a case study with data derived from the 2007–2011 Truven Health MarketScan Research database to discuss opportunities and challenges for the use of administrative claims data to examine the costs and service utilization of allogeneic HCT and chemotherapy alone for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Starting with a cohort of 29,915 potentially eligible patients with a diagnosis of AML, we were able to identify 211 patients treated with HCT and 774 treated with chemotherapy only where we were sufficiently confident of the diagnosis and treatment path to allow analysis. Administrative claims data provide an avenue to meet the need for health care costs, resource utilization, and outcome information. However, when using these data, a balance between clinical knowledge and applied methods is critical to identifying a valid study cohort and accurate measures of costs and resource utilization.

No abstract