Background: This study evaluated the association between practical performance-based indices of preoperative physical functioning and short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing hepatic resection.Method: Preoperative characteristics and results of practical performance-based tests of physical functioning were analyzed concerning the effect on postoperative outcomes (recovery of physical functioning, non-surgical complications, and length of hospital stay) using univariable and multivariable logistic regression.Results: Perioperative data of 96 patients showed that besides the conventional risk-factors (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III and BMI), lower absolute steep ramp test performance (in watts; OR 0.992), and lower perceived level of functional capacity to perform activities of daily living (ADL) on Duke activity status index (in metabolic equivalent of task (MET); OR 0.806) and lower score on the veterans-specific activity questionnaire (in MET, OR 0.875) were associated with delayed recovery of physical functioning. Furthermore, more comorbidities, worse functional mobility, and lower levels of perceived functional capacity to perform ADL were associated with non-surgical complications and length of hospital stay. Conclusion:Adequate preoperative performance and perceived level of functional capacity to perform ADL appear to be of importance to identify individual patients that are at risk of a complicated postoperative course.

Introduction: Prehabilitation aims for an optimal physical functioning level before, during, and after hospitalization for major surgery. The purpose of this case report was to illustrate the care pathway of a high-risk patient who opted for pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, including preparation for this procedure by participating in a community-based exercise prehabilitation program. The report describes patient examination, evaluation in decision-making for surgery, the prehabilitation program, and outcomes within the context of the Hypothesis-Oriented Algorithm for Clinicians II. Case Description: The patient was a 75-year-old woman with a history of several comorbidities and a polypoid mass in the descending segment of the duodenum. Based on the preoperative assessment, the level of physical functioning was expected to be insufficient to cope adequately with the stress of hospitalization and surgery. Intervention: A 4-week prehabilitation program, including aerobic, resistance, and functional task training in a community-based physical therapy practice. Outcomes: Prehabilitation had a beneficial impact on improving functional mobility preoperatively (timed up-and-go test score improved from 19.4 to 10.0 s, five times sit-to-stand test score improved from 30.1 to 10.1 s, and two-minute walk test distance improved from 55.0 to 107.0 m). Surgery and postoperative recovery proceeded without complications. She achieved independent physical functioning on postoperative day 6 and was discharged home on postoperative day 12. Conclusion: Preoperative risk-assessment can support clinical decision-making in a high-risk patient opting for major abdominal surgery. Furthermore, a remarkable improvement in physical functioning can be achieved by community-based prehabilitation in a high-risk surgical patient.

Background Evidence about the role of physical therapy in perioperative care pathways to improve postoperative outcomes is growing. However, it is unclear whether research findings have been translated into daily practice. Objective The objectives of this study were to describe the current content and between-hospital variability of perioperative physical therapist management for patients undergoing colorectal, hepatic, or pancreatic resection in the Netherlands and to compare currently recommended state-of-the-art physical therapy with self-reported daily clinical physical therapist management. Design This was a cross-sectional survey study. Methods Hospital physical therapists were asked to complete an online survey about pre- and postoperative physical therapy at their hospital. To explore the variability of perioperative physical therapist management between hospitals, frequency variables were clustered to determine the level of uniformity. Latent class analysis was performed to identify clusters of hospitals with certain homogeneous characteristics on a 19-item dichotomous scale. Results Of 82 eligible Dutch hospitals, 65 filled out the survey (79.3%). Preoperative physical therapy was performed in 34 hospitals (54.0%; 2/65 responding hospitals were excluded from the data analysis). Postoperative physical therapy was performed in all responding hospitals, focusing mainly on regaining independent physical functioning. Latent class analysis identified a 3-class model. Hospitals in classes I and II were more likely to provide preoperative physical therapist interventions than hospitals in class III. Limitations The use of self-reported answers can lead to bias. Conclusions There was a wide degree of variability between hospitals regarding pre- and postoperative clinical physical therapist practice for patients opting for major abdominal surgery. Three different classes of daily practice were identified. Further translation of key research findings into clinical physical therapist practice is advised, especially for hospitals in which the physical therapist is not involved preoperatively. Moreover, improving uniformity by developing up-to-date clinical guidelines is recommended.