Background The Caprini score is a validated scale that calculates a patient's 30-day venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk based on their comorbidities. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons published VTE prophylaxis recommendations in 2011 based on the Caprini score, but these recommendations are vague and up to physician interpretation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate postoperative outcomes after the application of strict guidelines using the Caprini score with specific VTE chemoprophylaxis benchmarks on plastic surgery patients. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on all plastic surgery patients who underwent surgery between July 2019 and July 2021. Patients between July 2019 and June 2020 were not subjected to any specific VTE prophylaxis protocol, while patients from July 2020 to July 2021 were subjected to the newly created VTE prophylaxis protocol. Every patient received a calculated Caprini score at their preoperative history and physical. The primary outcomes measured include hematoma, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Results Four hundred forty-one patients with 541 procedures were included in this study, with 275 patients in the “before” group and 166 patients in the “after” group. A total of 78.6% of patients received chemoprophylaxis in the “before” group compared with 20% in the “after” group. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups including PE or DVT (P = 0.2684 and 0.2696, respectively), with a trend toward hematoma formation in the “before” group (P = 0.1358). After the application of evidence-based VTE guidelines, the patients stayed fewer days in the hospital (0.4 vs 0.7 days, P = 0.0085) and were less likely to be readmitted (2.4% vs 6.5%, P = 0.0333). The average cost per patient in the “before” group was $9.11 with a total cost of $3022.90. The average cost per patient in the “after” group was $4.23 with a total cost of $867.94 (P = 0.032). Conclusions Our strict application of the Caprini score significantly and safely limited the number of patients receiving postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis and showed no significant difference in postoperative hematoma, DVT, or PE.

The authors reviewed the outcome of 12 patients who underwent soleus flap reconstruction of distal third lower extremity defects. Nine of the 12 patients achieved a healed, stable wound; however, several flaps and multiple additional procedures were often required. One of the 12 patients experienced soleus flap loss and two of the patients required below-knee amputations. Failure of limb salvage was related to traumatic injuries or comorbid conditions such as peripheral vascular disease, smoking, and planned radiation. They conclude that these factors should be considered relative contraindications to the use of the soleus flap in the distal third of the leg, and that free flap coverage is the most reliable option for these high-risk patients.

This case report presents a 38-year-old female who was scheduled for abdominal panniculectomy and tested positive for BRCA2 mutation through Geisinger MyCode V R. She canceled her panniculectomy and elected to proceed with bilateral mastectomies, utilizing her abdominal tissue for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction.

No abstract

Background: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is offered as part of the standard-of-care to females undergoing mastectomy. Racial disparity in IBR has been previously reported with a longstanding call for its elimination, though unknown if this goal is achieved. The aim of this study was to examine the current association between race and IBR and to investigate whether racial disparity is diminishing. Methods: Data was extracted from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2016. All variables in the database were controlled so that the comparison would be made solely between Black and White females. We also analyzed the trend in racial disparity to see if there has been a change from 2004 to 2016 after several calls for healthcare equality. Results: After propensity score matching, 69,084 White females were compared to 69,084 Black females. There was a statistically significant difference between the rate of IBR and race (23,386 [33.9%] in White females vs 20,850 [30.2%] in Black females, P-value  < .001). Despite a twofold increase in the rate of IBR in both White and Black females, a persistent gap of about 4% was observed over the study period, which translates to more than 2,500 Black females not receiving IBR. Conclusions: Using the NCDB database, a racial disparity was identified for IBR between White and Black females from 2004 and 2016. Unfortunately, the gap between the groups remained constant over this 13-year period.