Background: Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is widely used to detect SARS-CoV-2 infections. A small proportion (3-5%) of the samples turn out to be inconclusive which are difficult to interpret and require repeat testing. Methods: This study utilizing RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 collected data from the viral RNA extracted using Maccura Mag-Bind RNA from NPOP specimen, then amplified and quantified using Maccura SARS-CoV-2 Fluorescent PCR kit. The data with inconclusive interpretation and re-test results were selected and further analysed. Results: The retrospective analysis of 247 inconclusive samples that were retested was included in the study. Among the inconclusive results from the first test, 80% of samples which expressed SARS-CoV-2 N and E genes (without ORF1ab gene) turned out to be positive in the repeat test (p < 0.001), while 55% of samples that had only one gene expressed initially, were positive on repeat testing. The E gene was detected (without N and ORF1ab gene) in nine samples, of which seven were negative on re-testing. Conclusions: Our study suggests that it is beneficial to repeat the SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test, especially when two genes are expressed, while detection of only E gene in the first test can be regarded as negative.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.