Demethylation at distinct lysine residues in histone H3 by lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) causes either gene repression or activation. As a component of co-repressor complexes, LSD1 contributes to target gene repression by removing mono- and dimethyl marks from lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4). In contrast, during androgen receptor (AR)-activated gene expression, LSD1 removes mono- and dimethyl marks from lysine 9 of histone H3 (H3K9). Yet, the mechanisms that control this dual specificity of demethylation are unknown. Here we show that phosphorylation of histone H3 at threonine 6 (H3T6) by protein kinase C beta I (PKCbeta(I), also known as PRKCbeta) is the key event that prevents LSD1 from demethylating H3K4 during AR-dependent gene activation. In vitro, histone H3 peptides methylated at lysine 4 and phosphorylated at threonine 6 are no longer LSD1 substrates. In vivo, PKCbeta(I) co-localizes with AR and LSD1 on target gene promoters and phosphorylates H3T6 after androgen-induced gene expression. RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated knockdown of PKCbeta(I) abrogates H3T6 phosphorylation, enhances demethylation at H3K4, and inhibits AR-dependent transcription. Activation of PKCbeta(I) requires androgen-dependent recruitment of the gatekeeper kinase protein kinase C (PKC)-related kinase 1 (PRK1). Notably, increased levels of PKCbeta(I) and phosphorylated H3T6 (H3T6ph) positively correlate with high Gleason scores of prostate carcinomas, and inhibition of PKCbeta(I) blocks AR-induced tumour cell proliferation in vitro and cancer progression of tumour xenografts in vivo. Together, our data establish that androgen-dependent kinase signalling leads to the writing of the new chromatin mark H3T6ph, which in consequence prevents removal of active methyl marks from H3K4 during AR-stimulated gene expression.

Two distinct genes encode the closely related signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins STAT5A and STAT5B. The molecular mechanisms of gene regulation by STAT5 and, particularly, the requirement for both STAT5 isoforms are still undetermined. Only a few STAT5 target genes, among them the CIS (cytokine-inducible SH2-containing protein) gene, have been identified. We cloned the human CIS gene and studied the human CIS gene promoter. This promoter contains four STAT binding elements organized in two pairs. By electrophoretic mobility shift assay studies using nuclear extracts of UT7 cells stimulated with erythropoietin, we showed that these four sequences bound to STAT5-containing complexes that exhibited different patterns and affinities: the three upstream STAT binding sequences bound to two distinct STAT5-containing complexes (C0 and C1) and the downstream STAT box bound only to the slower-migrating C1 band. Using nuclear extracts from COS-7 cells transfected with expression vectors for the prolactin receptor, STAT5A, and/or STAT5B, we showed that the C1 complex was composed of a STAT5 tetramer and was dependent on the presence of STAT5A. STAT5B lacked this property and bound with a stronger affinity than did STAT5A to the four STAT sequences as a homodimer (C0 complex). This distinct biochemical difference between STAT5A and STAT5B was confirmed with purified activated STAT5 recombinant proteins. Moreover, we showed that the presence on the same side of the DNA helix of a second STAT sequence increased STAT5 binding and that only half of the palindromic STAT binding sequence was sufficient for the formation of a STAT5 tetramer. Again, STAT5A was essential for this cooperative tetrameric association. This property distinguishes STAT5A from STAT5B and could be essential to explain the transcriptional regulation diversity of STAT5.STAT proteins are latent transcription factors containing a Src homology 2 domain (SH2 domain) that become activated by tyrosine phosphorylation. The binding of the STAT SH2 domains to the phosphorylated cytokine receptors allows their tyrosine phosphorylation by Jak kinases. After dimerization and nuclear translocation, STAT dimers bind to specific DNA sequences, thereby allowing downstream gene regulation.

No abstract

No abstract

Members of the family of cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) have been recognized as pivotal regulators of cell cycle progression for more than 20 years. Concordant to their central role in the control of cell division they have been in the focus of research of proliferation associated diseases ever since, most prominently amongst these cancer. Although initial results obtained from first and second generation, low specificity CDK inhibitors (e.g. Flavopyridol, Roscovitine, Dinaciclib, AT7519, R547) have been sobering the recent approval of the first CDK-inhibitor Palbociclib for the treatment of certain forms of breast cancer clearly demonstrates the suitability of cell cycle CDKs as targets in oncology. Furthermore, in addition to cell cycle CDKs a second group of CDKs have been shown to have important roles in the regulation of gene transcription, and several of the “transcriptional” CDKs have become interesting targets in oncology. Recent results underline the notion that for being effective in the treatment of cancer, CDK inhibition requires very high specificity towards the respective target CDK(s). For example CDK1 knockdown or CDK9 inhibition have been shown to be synthetically lethal in combination with MYC overexpression. Selectivity of compounds within the family of CDKs could so far only be tested using a quite limited number of CDK-Cyclin complexes expressed in human cells. To date there are 20 CDK genes and at least 17 different Cyclin genes described, many of which give rise to different variants, e.g. there are 3 D-type cyclins, two A- and E-type cyclins etc.. Experimental data indicates that at least 50-60 different, biologically relevant CDK-Cyclin complexes may exist, but only a limited number of these are available for biochemical testing of drug candidates so far. We have recombinantly expressed and purified 28 different CDK-Cyclin complexes, covering a significant part of the CDK family, and established in-vitro kinase-activity assays for these recombinant enzymes. The resulting CDK panel represents the most comprehensive array for biochemical testing of this enzyme group currently available. We characterized the specificity of several CDK inhibitors that have been or are currently in preclinical or clinical development with this CDK collection. Results will be presented showing the specificity of these inhibitors not only for CDKs but also for CDKs complexed to different Cyclins. In several cases we could detect signifcant differences in the inhibition of the same CDK complexed to different Cyclins, e.g. a 10fold difference was seen for CDK6 complexes with Cyclin D1-3. A >100 fold difference was detected for CDK3 complexed to either Cyclin E1 or Cyclin C. This screening panel allows generating data on compound selectivity early in development, diminishing the risk of designing a compound with suboptimal target specificity. Citation Format: Daniel Mueller, Frank Totzke, Thomas Weber, Christian Beisenherz-Huss, Diane Kraemer, Carolin Heidemann-Dinger, Constance Ketterer, Chris Eckert, Michael H.G. Kubbutat. Characterization of CDK inhibitors in a biochemical assay using a comprehensive panel of human CDK-cyclin complexes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2821.