No abstract

ObjectivesOwing to novel therapy strategies in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated patients, molecular analysis of the EGFR and KRAS genome has become crucial for routine diagnostics. Till date these data have been derived mostly from clinical trials, and thus collected in pre-selected populations. We therefore screened ‘allcomers’ with a newly diagnosed non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) for the frequencies of these mutations.DesignA cohort study.SettingLung cancer centre in a tertiary care hospital.ParticipantsWithin 15 months, a total of 552 cases with NSCLC were eligible for analysis.Primary and secondary outcome measuresFrequency of scrutinising exons 18, 19 and 21 for the presence of activating EGFR mutation and secondary codon 12 and 13 for activating KRAS mutations.ResultsOf the 552 patients, 27 (4.9%) showed a mutation of EGFR. 19 of these patients (70%) had deletion E746-A750 in codon 19 or deletion L858R in codon 21. Adenocarcinoma (ACA) was the most frequent histology among patients with EGFR mutations (ACA, 22/254 (8.7%) vs non-ACA, 5/298 (1.7%); p<0.001). Regarding only ACA, the percentage of EGFR mutations was higher in women (16/116 (14%) women vs 6/138 (4.3%) men; p=0.008). Tumours with an activating EGFR mutation were more likely to be from non-smokers (18/27; 67%) rather than smoker (9/27; 33%).KRAS mutation was present in 85 (15%) of all cases. In 73 patients (86%), the mutation was found in exon 12 and in 12 cases (14%) in exon 13. Similarly, ACA had a higher frequency of KRAS mutations than non-ACA (67/254 (26%) vs 18/298 (6.0%); p<0.001).ConclusionsWe found a lower frequency for EGFR and KRAS mutations in an unselected Caucasian patient cohort as previously published. Taking our results into account, clinical trials may overestimate the mutation frequency for EGFR and KRAS in NSCLC due to important selection biases.

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to analyze the frequency of Thyroid Transcription Factor (TTF)-1 expression in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and its value for the diagnosis of SCLC, the response to first line treatment as well as the prognostic impact on overall survival (OS).MethodsWe analyzed a total of 294 patients (m, n = 184; f, n = 110) with SCLC (stage IIIA, n = 32; IIIB, n = 87; IV, n = 175) diagnosed in our institution between January 2005 and December 2008. Patient’s characteristics comprising age, gender, histology and first line treatment were included into the analyses. For the follow-up of patients the governmental death registrar was used. The TTF-1 immunostaining was prospectively performed. CT scans of all patients were reviewed and response to treatment was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.0 (RECIST) criteria.ResultsA total of 221 of the 294 patients were eligible for analysis. Patients with TTF-1-positive SCLC had a median OS of 374 (95% CI 306–442) days. The OS of patients with TTF1-negative SCLC was 290 (95% CI 191–389) days, which was not significantly shorter (p = 0.254). Also stratification for tumor stage did not reveal significant difference in OS. Analyzing the disease control rate (DCR) in patients with metastatic disease (stage IV), we observed a significantly (p = 0.006) improved response to treatment in the group of patients with TTF-1-expression (DCR 86% vs. 56%). Regarding the overall response rates (ORR) in the entire population, there was no difference observed between both subgroups. (TTF-1-pos. 75.3% vs. TTF-1-neg. 71.4%; p = 0.642).ConclusionsThe diagnostic information of TTF-1 in SCLC seems to be limited. TTF-1 had no prognostic value concerning OS, but may serve as a predictor for response to first line chemotherapy.Virtual slidesThe virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/5811254651472285

The use of FDG-PET/CT staging mainly in the preoperative setting leads to stage migration of patients with a better prognosis into the worst stage (IV) and thus longer survival within this subgroup. This survival benefit is unrelated to treatment and needs to be addressed in future studies.

We present a 74-year-old male with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) during treatment with ibrutinib for mantle cell lymphoma. Previously, the patient had received six cycles of bendamustine and rituximab and six cycles of R-CHOP, followed by rituximab maintenance therapy. Respiratory tract complications of ibrutinib other than infectious pneumonia have not been mentioned in larger trials, but individual case reports hinted to a possible association with the development of pneumonitis. In our patient, the onset of alveolitis that progressed towards NSIP together with the onset of ibrutinib treatment suggests causality. One week after ibrutinib was discontinued, nasal symptoms resolved first. A follow-up CT showed a reduction in the reticular hyperdensities and ground-glass opacities, suggestive of restitution of the lung disease. To our knowledge, this is the first case showing a strong link between ibrutinib and interstitial lung disease, strengthening a previous report on subacute pneumonitis. Our findings have clinical implications because pulmonary side effects were reversible at this early stage. We, therefore, suggest close monitoring for respiratory side effects in patients receiving ibrutinib.