The main chapters 2 to 5 of this dissertation base on separate research papers. They are the result of collaborations between the author of the dissertation, his Post-Doc supervisor Michael Pahle, and other colleagues as indicated.

No abstract

No abstract

We analyze the gross welfare gains from real-time retail pricing in electricity markets where carbon taxation induces investment in variable renewable technologies. Applying a stylized numerical electricity market model, we find a U-shaped association between carbon taxation and gross welfare gains. The benefits of introducing real-time pricing can accordingly be relatively low at relatively high carbon taxes and vice versa. The nonmonotonous change in welfare gains can be explained by corresponding changes in the inefficiency arising from "under-consumption" during low-price periods rather than by changes in wholesale price volatility. Our results may cast doubt on the efficiency of ongoing roll-outs of advanced meters in many electricity markets, since net benefits might only materialize at relatively high carbon tax levels and renewable supply shares.

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Abstract: The emerging literature on power markets with high shares of fluctuating renewables suggests that more frequent start-up procedures of thermal power plants may become an increasing concern, both for costs and possibly also for market design. Based on official scenario assumptions, we investigate how start-ups and related costs develop in Germany, where the share of fluctuating renewables quadruples between 2010 and 2030. We find that the overall number of start-ups decreases by a third, while related costs increase by half. The relative share of start-up costs in overall variable costs of thermal plants grows only slightly and remains below 1%. Several overlapping effects drive these results. The expansion of fluctuating renewables alone would strongly increase start-up costs. In contrast, increased flexibility of biomass power plants, additional power storage and larger block sizes have opposite effects. While the relevance of start-up costs grows only moderately under baseline assumptions, it may increase further under alternative developments of system flexibility. Future power market design reforms should thus aim to ensure proper remuneration of quasi-fixed start-up costs. Our findings are also relevant for many other countries with thermal power systems that plan to undergo comparable transitions toward fluctuating renewables. Terms of use: Documents inJEL: Q41; Q47