The current situation of volatile milk prices and rising costs of, e.g. grain and labour, suggests that it is worth studying productivity and efficiency in dairy farming. The objective of the current whole-system study, carried out in lowland Central Switzerland from 2007 to 2010, was to compare the performance, efficiency, land productivity and profitability of indoor-feeding (IF) dairy production with that of pasture-based feeding (PF) dairy production. An IF herd consisting of 11 Holstein-Friesian (HF) and 13 Brown Swiss (BS) cows was kept in a free-stall barn and fed a part-mixed ration (PMR) of maize silage, grass silage and protein concentrate. The cows were allocated 15·8 ha of agricultural land (AL). In the PMR, an average per lactation of 443 kg protein concentrate and 651 kg compound feed was fed by a concentrate dispenser according to the requirements of each cow. The PF herd comprised 14 Swiss Fleckvieh (SF) and 14 BS cows, which were kept in a free-stall barn throughout the winter; barn-ventilated hay was offered ad libitum during the lactation period. This herd was allocated 15·7 ha of AL. After calving in spring, the PF cows grazed on semi-continuous pastures; they consumed an average of 285 kg of concentrate per lactation. The IF cows of the BS breed produced significantly more energy-corrected milk (ECM) per standard lactation compared with PF cows (8750 v. 5610 kg), more milk fat (350 v. 213 kg) and more milk protein (306 v. 203 kg). However, the milk of PF cows had higher levels of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) (1·9 v. 0·6 g/100 g fat) and ω − 3 fatty acids (1·7 v. 0·9 g/100 g fat) than the milk of the IF cows. The calving interval (378 v. 405 days) and the empty time (87 v. 118 days) of the BS breed were significantly shorter in the PF in comparison with that of the IF production system. The IF herd yielded significantly higher ECM/ha AL and year (12 716 v. 10 307 kg), and showed a higher feed efficiency (1·3 v. 1·1 kg ECM/kg of total dry matter intake (DMI)). The productivity per hour was roughly similar in the two systems (IF: 76 v. PF: 73 kg milk/h). The PF system resulted in higher labour income compared with the IF system (20·7 v. 13·4 E/h), but the difference was not significant. In conclusion, land productivity and efficiency were higher with the IF herd than the PF herd due to the higher energy intake per kg feed. However, within the given conditions, the more interesting case, economically, might be the reduced costs and improved milk quality of the PF system rather than the increased milk yield of the IF cows.

This article explores the relevance of sustainable business development for society and the state. Sustainability of enterprises can be defined as demonstrating the ability to be capable of continuing the same type of business in the lifetime of the next generation. In the case of Swiss dairy farms, this type of sustainability may also depend on the willingness of the government and society to make the necessary financial adjustments. Sustainability indicators for such farms are, therefore, related to ecological and social benefits rather than simply to economic success. To evaluate the role of Swiss dairy farms, a system with economic, ecological and social indicators for measuring their sustainability would be valuable. This approach creates an integration of sustainability life-cycle assessment factors of enterprises, on the one hand, and purely economic business indicators, on the other. The approach developed in this article would be of interest to all sectors that depend on public support.

No abstract

In the course of climate change, the future importance of regions for agricultural production may change significantly (Zabel et al., 2014).With the continuing demand for animal products and the increasing competition for arable land, the attractiveness of grassland could increase in the future (Röös et al., 2017;Schader et al., 2015;Zumwald et al., 2019). The pre-alpine region is characterized by high rainfalls and clay-rich soils, which guarantee optimal conditions for good grass growth. Up to 70% of the forage areas in the pre-alpine regions are permanent grasslands, the yields of which cannot be used for direct human consumption (Coch et al., 2009;

Dairy farmers face various challenges in developing their businesses. The current literature identifies several constraints towards a more efficient dairy sector that relate mostly to on-farm management practices. The available studies analyze constraints mostly from the objective viewpoint of the researcher, whereas very little is known about what farmers themselves perceive to be challenging. To better understand the farmers' perspective and what they perceive to be challenging, and how these challenges differ across regions, this paper builds on a survey of 529 dairy farmers in Malawi. In the survey, respondents were asked in an open question to name their three main challenges. Based on the responses, a three-level coding scheme was elaborated. Data were then coded by two researchers to ensure reliability of coding. Codes were then used to calculate relative frequencies for the different challenges and to perform chi-square tests to check for regional differences in frequencies. Results suggest that farmers perceive low milk price and milk yield, animal health, availability of feedstock, and the costs for drugs as the main challenges. The analysis also revealed that the challenges vary strongly between the three main regions in the country -Blantyre (south), Lilongwe (central), and Mzuzu (north). The perceived challenges reflect the different production systems in the regions. In Blantyre, dairy farming is low in intensity, and farmers thus perceive inputs, in particular the availability of fodder, as well as outputs, in particular milk yields more frequently as a challenge than farmers in Lilongwe and Mzuzu. In contrast, dairy farming in Lilongwe is the most intense. Accordingly, farmers in Lilongwe perceive costs, in particular for inputs such as mash and concentrates as major constraints. Farmers in Mzuzu, which is a rather remote region, consider a lack of assistance, in particular concerning extension services significantly more challenging than the farmers in the other two regions do. Considering these insights, development work and extensions services may be able to increase outcomes in the dairy sector by targeting the regional challenges.