Ionic liquid crystals (ILCs), that is, ionic liquids exhibiting mesomorphism, liquid crystalline phases, and anisotropic properties, have received intense attention in the past years. Among others, this is due to their special properties arising from the combination of properties stemming from ionic liquids and from liquid crystalline arrangements. Besides interesting fundamental aspects, ILCs have been claimed to have tremendous application potential that again arises from the combination of properties and architectures that are not accessible otherwise, or at least not accessible easily by other strategies. The current review highlights recent developments in ILC research, starting with some key fundamental aspects. Further subjects covered include the synthesis and variations of modern ILCs, including the specific tuning of their mesomorphic behavior. The review concludes with reflections on some applications that may be within reach for ILCs and finally highlights a few key challenges that must be overcome prior and during true commercialization of ILCs.

Ionic liquid crystals (ILCs) are soft matter materials with broad liquid crystalline phases and intrinsic electric conductivity. They typically consist of a rod-shaped mesogenic ion and a smaller spherical counter-ion. Their mesomorphic properties can be easily tuned by exchanging the counter ion. ILCs show a strong tendency to form smectic A phases due to the segregation of ionic and the non-ionic molecular segments. Nematic phases are therefore extremely rare in ILCs and the question of why nematic phases are so exceptional in existing ILCs, and how nematic ILCs might be obtained in the future is of vital interest for both the fundamental understanding and the potential applications of ILCs. Here, we present the result of a simulation study, which highlights the crucial role of the location of the ionic charge on the rod-like mesogenic ions in the phase behaviour of ILCs. We find that shifting the charge from the ends towards the centre of the mesogenic ion destabilizes the liquid crystalline state and induces a change from smectic A to nematic phases.

X‐ray diffraction (XRD) is one of the most important methods to assess the long‐range translational order in smectic A (SmA) liquid crystals. Nevertheless, the knowledge about the influence of the molecular electron density distribution (MEDD) on the XRD pattern is rather limited because it is not possible to vary the orientational order, the translational order and the MEDD independently in an experiment. We here present a systematic simulation study in which we examine this effect and show that the MEDD indeed has a major impact on the general appearance of the XRD pattern. More specifically, we find that the smectic layer peaks and the intensity ratios thereof strongly depend on the width of the MEDD. The classic approach by Leadbetter et al. to determine the smectic translational order parameter ∑ from XRD intensities works if the MEDD is quite narrow. In all other cases the influence of the MEDD has to be taken into account.

A tricarbosilane-terminated mesogen with an axially chiral biphenyl core forms a ferroelectric liquid crystal phase.