Background Experiences of HIV stigma remain prevalent across Canada, causing significant stress and negatively affecting the health and wellbeing of people living with HIV. While studies have consistently demonstrated that stigma negatively impacts health, there has been limited research on the mechanisms behind these effects. This study aims to identify which dimensions of stigma have significant relationships with self-rated health and examine the mechanisms by which those types of stigma impact self-rated health. Methods We recruited 724 participants to complete the People Living with HIV Stigma Index in Ontario, designed by people living with HIV to measure nuanced changes in stigma and discrimination. The present study utilizes data from externally validated measures of stigma and health risks that were included in the survey. First, we conducted multiple regression analyses to examine which variables had a significant impact on self-rated health. Results from the multiple regression guided the mediation analysis. A parallel mediation model was created with enacted stigma as the antecedent, internalized stigma and depression as the mediators, and self-rated health as the outcome. Results In the multiple regression analysis, internalized stigma (coefficient = −0.20, p < 0.01) and depression (coefficient = −0.07, p < 0.01) were both significant and independent predictors of health. Mediation analyses demonstrated that the relationship between enacted stigma and self-rated health is mediated in parallel by both internalized stigma [coefficient = −0.08, se = 0.03, 95% CI (−0.14, −0.02)] and depression [coefficient = −0.16, se = 0.03, 95% CI (−0.22, −0.11)]. Conclusions We developed a mediation model to explain how HIV-related stigma negatively impacts health. We found that that enacted stigma, or experiences of prejudice or discrimination, can lead to internalized stigma, or internalization of negative thoughts regarding one’s HIV status and/or increased depressive symptoms which then may lead to worse overall health. Highlighting the importance of internalized stigma and depression has the potential to shape the development of targeted intervention strategies aimed at reducing the burden of stigma and improving the health and wellbeing of people living with HIV.

Background Undetectable=Untransmittable (U=U) first emerged in 2016 as a health information campaign to promote rigorous scientific evidence that people living with HIV (PLHIV) on effective treatment who have reached an undetectable or suppressed viral load cannot pass on the virus sexually. Within 7 years, U=U underwent transformation from a global community-led, grassroots movement into a global HIV/AIDS health equity strategy and policy priority. Methods For this narrative review, a targeted literature search on ‘history’ + ‘Undetectable=Untransmittable’ and/or ‘U=U’ on Google and Google Scholar, in addition to a search of online documents on the Prevention Access Campaign (PAC) website, was conducted. The article utilises an interdisciplinary policy studies approach that recognises the roles of multi-stakeholder, especially that of the community and civil society, to effect policy change. Results The narrative review first provides a synopsis of the scientific origination of U=U. The second section highlights the progress and leadership on U=U led by the PAC and civil society partners and efforts of the PLHIV and ally communities in advocating for the broad recognition and dissemination of the evidence, which has proven to be a game-changer within the HIV/AIDS response. The third section spotlights the recent developments of U=U within the local, national, and multilateral spheres. Conclusion The article ends with recommendations for community and HIV/AIDS multi-stakeholders on how they can further integrate, implement, and strategically utilise U=U as an essential and complementary HIV/AIDS pillar to the current Global AIDS Strategy 2021–2026 to end inequalities to end AIDS by 2030.

Background: The Tracks survey of people who inject drugs (PWID) collected data in 14 sentinel sites across Canada (2017–2019). These findings describe the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C and associated risk behaviours among Indigenous participants. Methods: Information regarding socio-demographics, social determinants of health, use of prevention services and testing, drug use, risk behaviours, and HIV and hepatitis C testing, care and treatment was collected through interviewer-administered questionnaires. Biological samples were tested for HIV, hepatitis C antibodies and hepatitis C ribonucleic acid (RNA). Descriptive statistics were calculated and reviewed by an Indigenous-led advisory group using the Two-Eyed Seeing approach. Results: Of the 2,383 participants, 997 were Indigenous (82.9% First Nations, 14.9% Métis, 2.2% Inuit). Over half (54.5%) were cisgender male and the average age was 38.9 years. A large proportion (84.0%) reported their mental health as “fair to excellent”. High proportions experienced stigma and discrimination (90.2%) and physical, sexual and/or emotional abuse in childhood (87.5%) or with a sexual partner (78.6%). Use of a needle/syringe distribution program (90.5%) and testing for HIV (87.9%) and hepatitis C (87.8%) were high. Prevalence of HIV was 15.4% (78.2% were aware of infection status) and 36.4% were hepatitis C RNA-positive (49.4% were aware of infection status). Conclusion: High rates of HIV and hepatitis C were identified. Challenges in access to and maintenance of HIV and hepatitis C care and treatment were noted. This information informs harm reduction strategies, including the need to scale-up awareness of prophylaxis in a culturally relevant manner.

In the United States, men who have sex with men (MSM) remain as the demographic group with the highest HIV incidence rates and account for 53% of new HIV infections in 2006 (Rajasingham, Mimiaga, White, Pinkston, Baden, & Mitty, 2012). One of the reasons accounting for such high rates of HIV transmission between gay, bisexual and MSM (GBM) can be attributed to poly-substance use and the use of crystal methamphetamine (Solomon, Halkitis, Moeller, & Pappas, 2012; Rajasingham et al., 2012). The U.S. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (2007) reported methamphetamine use in the MSM community is of particular concern due to the high prevalence of HIV and the use of the stimulant. Meanwhile, researchers have found methamphetamine use is closely corrleated to sexual risk taking among GBM and such intimate link between risky sexual behaviour and methamphetamine use have led to a possible double epidemic (Halkitis, Green, & Carragher, 2006). In particular, the use of methamphetamine has been found to be correlated to the frequency of unprotected insertive anal intercourse (UIAI) and unprotected receptive anal intercourse (URAI) among HIV positive and persons with unknown serostatus causal partners over time (Halkitis, Mukherjee, & Palamar, 2009). As an effort to better understand this social pheonemon, this paper focuses on the exploration and identification of the psycho-social and socio-cultural factors of crystal methamphetamine use among the GBM population.

Contexte : L’enquête Track auprès des utilisateurs de drogues injectables a permis de recueillir des données dans quatorze sites sentinelles au Canada (2017 à 2019). Ces résultats décrivent la prévalence du virus de l’immunodéficience humaine (VIH), de l’hépatite C et des comportements à risque associés à ceux-ci chez les participants autochtones. Méthodes : Des informations sur les caractéristiques sociodémographiques, les déterminants sociaux de la santé, le recours aux services de prévention et au dépistage, la consommation de drogues, les comportements à risque, ainsi que le dépistage, les soins et le traitement du VIH et de l’hépatite C ont été recueillies par l’entremise de questionnaires administrés par un intervieweur. Les échantillons biologiques ont été analysés pour y détecter la présence d’anticorps anti-VIH et anti-hépatite C et l’acide ribonucléique (ARN) de l’hépatite C. Les statistiques descriptives ont été calculées et examinées par un groupe consultatif dirigé par des autochtones, selon l’approche à double perspective (Two-Eyed Seeing). Résultats : Parmi les 2 383 participants, 997 étaient des autochtones (82,9 % étaient des membres des Premières Nations, 14,9 % étaient des Métis et 2,2 % étaient des Inuits). Plus de la moitié (54,5 %) étaient des hommes cisgenres et l’âge moyen était de 38,9 ans. Une grande proportion (84,0 %) des participants ont déclaré que leur santé mentale était de « passable excellente ». Une forte proportion d’entre eux ont été victimes de stigmatisation et de discrimination (90,2 %) ainsi que de violences physiques, sexuelles et/ou psychologiques durant l’enfance (87,5 %) ou de la part d’un partenaire sexuel (78,6 %). Un pourcentage élevé d’entre eux ont déclaré utiliser un programme de distribution de seringues (90,5 %) et avoir été dépisté pour le VIH (87,9 %) et l’hépatite C (87,8 %). La prévalence du VIH était de 15,4 % (78,2 % d’entre eux avaient connaissance de leur statut infectieux) et 36,4 % d’entre eux étaient séropositifs pour l’ARN de l’hépatite C (49,4 % d’entre eux avaient connaissance de leur statut infectieux). Conclusion : L’enquête a révélé des taux élevés de VIH et d’hépatite C. Elle a également révélé des défis liés à l’accès et au maintien des soins et des traitements liés au VIH et à l’hépatite C. Ces renseignements éclairent les stratégies de réduction des méfaits, y compris la nécessité d’accroître la sensibilisation à la prophylaxie d’une manière culturellement pertinente.