No abstract

Monolithic zirconia crowns may provide a valid treatment modality in the aesthetic zone in patients with severe tooth wear.

Zirconia‐based restorations are showing an increase as the clinicians’ preferred choice at posterior sites because of the strength and esthetic properties of such restorations. However, all‐ceramic restorations fracture at higher rates than do metal‐based restorations. Margin design is one of several factors that can affect the fracture strength of all‐ceramic restorations. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of preparation and crown margin design on fracture resistance. Four groups of bilayer zirconia crowns (with 10 crowns in each group) were produced by hard‐ or soft‐machining technique, with the following four different margin designs: chamfer preparation (control); slice preparation; slice preparation with an additional cervical collar of 0.7 mm thickness; and reduced occlusal thickness (to 0.4 mm) on slice preparation with an additional cervical collar of 0.7 mm thickness. Additionally, 10 hard‐machined crowns with slice preparation were veneered and glazed with feldspathic porcelain. In total, 90 crowns were loaded centrally in the occlusal fossa until fracture. The load at fracture was higher than clinically relevant mastication loads for all preparation and margin designs. The crowns on a chamfer preparation fractured at higher loads compared with crowns on a slice preparation. An additional cervical collar increased load at fracture for hard‐machined crowns.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of wall thickness on load at fracture of monolithic zirconia dental crowns after aging. Materials and Methods: Seventy translucent monolithic zirconia crowns (DD Bio ZX 2 , Dental Direkt GmbH) were produced to fit a second upper premolar preparation with a circumferential shallow chamfer. Thirty crowns had a minimum wall thickness of 0.4 mm and 40 had 0.8 mm. TwentyAQ4 of the thick-walled crowns were glazed. The remaining crowns were polished. Ten crowns from each group functioned as controls, while the remaining were subjected to an aging procedure of alternation between dynamic loading and autoclaving. The surviving crowns were assessed for margin damages and surface wear before beeing subjected to quasi-static loading until fracture. All fractures were analyzed by fractographic methods. Results: There were statistically significant differences among the test groups concerning the effects of aging and surface wear. All thick-walled and eight of the thin-walled crowns survived the aging procedure. All fracture origins both from dynamic and quasi-static loading were located in the cervical margin with crack propagation corresponding to cervical hoop stress as observed in clinical failures. Conclusions: Thin-walled translucent monolithic zirconia crowns were more affected by the aging procedure than thick-walled crowns.

No abstract