A genome-scale specificity and interaction map for yeast SH3 domain-containing proteins reveal how family members show selective binding to target proteins and predicts the dynamic localization of new candidate endocytosis proteins.

A substantial proportion of protein interactions relies on small domains binding to short peptides in the partner proteins. Many of these interactions are relatively low affinity and transient, and they impact on signal transduction. However, neither the number of potential interactions mediated by each domain nor the degree of promiscuity at a whole proteome level has been investigated. We have used a combination of phage display and SPOT synthesis to discover all the peptides in the yeast proteome that have the potential to bind to eight SH3 domains. We first identified the peptides that match a relaxed consensus, as deduced from peptides selected by phage display experiments. Next, we synthesized all the matching peptides at high density on a cellulose membrane, and we probed them directly with the SH3 domains. The domains that we have studied were grouped by this approach into five classes with partially overlapping specificity. Within the classes, however, the domains display a high promiscuity and bind to a large number of common targets with comparable affinity. We estimate that the yeast proteome contains as few as six peptides that bind to the Abp1 SH3 domain with a dissociation constant lower than 100 μM, while it contains as many as 50–80 peptides with corresponding affinity for the SH3 domain of Yfr024c. All the targets of the Abp1 SH3 domain, identified by this approach, bind to the native protein in vivo, as shown by coimmunoprecipitation experiments. Finally, we demonstrate that this strategy can be extended to the analysis of the entire human proteome. We have developed an approach, named WISE (whole interactome scanning experiment), that permits rapid and reliable identification of the partners of any peptide recognition module by peptide scanning of a proteome. Since the SPOT synthesis approach is semiquantitative and provides an approximation of the dissociation constants of the several thousands of interactions that are simultaneously analyzed in an array format, the likelihood of each interaction occurring in any given physiological settings can be evaluated. WISE can be easily extended to a variety of protein interaction domains, including those binding to modified peptides, thereby offering a powerful proteomic tool to help completing a full description of the cell interactome.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and gamma-interferon (IFNgamma) activate an overlapping set of genes via the Jak/STAT pathway. However, at least in human cells, a differential activation of STAT transcription factors was observed: IL-6 activates both acute phase response factor (APRF)/STAT3 and STAT1, whereas IFNgamma leads only to STAT1 activation. All STATs cloned so far contain SH2 domains. Since all cytokine receptors using the Jak/STAT pathway were found to be tyrosine-phosphorylated after ligand binding, it has been proposed that specific phosphotyrosine modules within the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor chains recruit different STAT factors. We have analyzed by mutational studies and by phosphopeptide competition assays which of the tyrosine modules of the IL-6 signal transducer gp130 are capable of recruiting either APRF or STAT1. We found that two of the four tyrosine modules that are important for APRF activation also activate STAT1. For these modules, we propose the new consensus sequence YXPQ. We further present evidence that STAT1 is activated independently from APRF suggesting that gp130 contains multiple independent STAT binding sites. We compare the APRF and STAT1 activation motifs of gp130 with the STAT1 activation motif of the IFNgamma receptor and demonstrate that the specificity of activation can be changed from APRF to STAT1 and vice versa by only two point mutations within a tyrosine module. These data strongly support the concept that the activation of a specific STAT is determined mainly by the phosphotyrosine module. The significance of these findings for other receptor systems is discussed.

Targeting of peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs) is a multistep process that requires not only recognition of PMPs in the cytosol but also their insertion into the peroxisomal membrane. As a consequence, targeting signals of PMPs (mPTS) are rather complex. A candidate protein for the PMP recognition event is Pex19p, which interacts with most PMPs. However, the respective Pex19p-binding sites are ill-defined and it is currently disputed whether these sites are contained within mPTS. By using synthetic peptide scans and yeast two-hybrid analyses, we determined and characterized Pex19p-binding sites in Pex11p and Pex13p, two PMPs from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The sites turned out to be composed of a short helical motif with a minimal length of 11 amino acids. With the acquired data, it proved possible to predict and experimentally verify Pex19p-binding sites in several other PMPs by applying a pattern search and a prediction matrix. A peroxisomally targeted Pex13p fragment became mislocalized to the endoplasmic reticulum in the absence of its Pex19p-binding site. By adding the heterologous binding site of Pex11p, peroxisomal targeting of the Pex13p fragment was restored. We conclude that Pex19p-binding sites are well-defined entities that represent an essential part of the mPTS. INTRODUCTIONPeroxisomes are ubiquitous organelles of eukaryotic cells, whose proteins are imported posttranslationally. Matrix proteins are directed to peroxisomes by either of two targeting signals, a C-terminal PTS1 or an N-terminal PTS2. The topogenesis of peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs) is accomplished by yet another mechanism, because most of the peroxin mutants, characterized by their defect in the biogenesis of peroxisomes, exhibit a block in matrix protein import, but do import PMPs normally (Lazarow and Fujiki, 1985;Gould and Valle, 2000;Subramani et al., 2000;Purdue and Lazarow, 2001;Eckert and Erdmann, 2003). To date, only three peroxins with a potential role in PMP targeting have been identified, namely Pex3p (Hettema et al., 2000;South et al., 2000), Pex16p in mammals (South and Gould, 1999;Honsho et al., 2002), and Pex19p (Gö tte et al., 1998;Matsuzono et al., 1999;Snyder et al., 1999;Soukupova et al., 1999). In cells lacking any of these proteins, PMPs are either degraded or mistargeted to other subcellular compartments such as mitochondria, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and membranes of unknown origin (Ghaedi et al., 2000;Hettema et al., 2000;Sacksteder et al., 2000).In accordance with a distinct pathway, PMPs use neither PTS1 nor PTS2. The targeting signals of PMPs (mPTS) that direct and insert PMPs into the peroxisomal membrane have been determined for a number of PMPs of several species. Despite some differences, a picture emerged from these studies of a targeting signal consisting of one or more transmembrane domains in conjunction with a short sequence, which contains either a cluster of basic residues or a mixture of basic and hydrophobic amino acids (Dyer et al., 1996;Baerends et al., 2000b;Pause et al., 2000;...

Tail-anchored proteins contain a single transmembrane domain (TMD) followed by a short C-terminal domain extending into the organellar lumen. Tail-anchored proteins are thought to target to the correct subcellular compartment by virtue of general physicochemical properties of their C-termini; however, the machineries that enable correct sorting remain largely elusive. Here we analyzed targeting of the human peroxisomal tail-anchored protein PEX26. Its C-terminal-targeting signal contains two binding sites for PEX19, the import receptor for several peroxisomal membrane proteins. One PEX19-binding site overlapped with the TMD, the other was contained within the luminal domain. Although the PEX19-binding site containing the TMD targeted to peroxisomes to some extent, the luminal site proved essential for correct targeting of the full-length protein, as it prevented PEX26 from mislocalization to mitochondria. Its function as a targeting motif was proved by its ability to insert a heterologous TMD-containing fragment into the peroxisomal membrane. Finally we show that PEX19 is essential for PEX26 import. Analysis of the yeast tail-anchored protein Pex15p revealed that it also harbors a luminal PEX19-binding site that acts as a peroxisomal-targeting motif. We conclude that C-terminal PEX19-binding sites mark tail-anchored proteins for delivery to peroxisomes.