A meta-analysis of 26 published articles (with 36 independent participant groups) was conducted to analyze the relationship between task-switching effects and aging. Latency served as the dependent measure. Multilevel modeling was used to test for additive and multiplicative complexity effects in local and global switch costs. Global task switching was found to add 1 or more stages to processing and resulted in a marked age deficit. Local task-switching costs, on the other hand, showed a multiplicative complexity effect but no specific attention-related age deficits. Cueing or switch predictability did not affect age differences.

This article reports the results of a meta-analysis of the effects of age, education, and estimated year of measurement on scores from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised Digit Symbol Substitution Test. Analysis of effect sizes for age reported in 141 studies published between 1986 and 2002 indicated a mean standardized difference of -2.07. Age accounted for 86% of the variance in a regression model using age, education, and year submitted as predictors of Digit Symbol scores. There was no association between years of education or year submitted and Digit Symbol scores for younger adults or older adults.

Some causal relations refer to causation by commission (e.g., "A gunshot causes death"), and others refer to causation by omission (e.g., "Not breathing causes death"). We describe a theory of the representation of omissive causation based on the assumption that people mentally simulate sets of possibilities-mental models-that represent causes, enabling conditions, and preventions (Goldvarg & Johnson-Laird, 2001). The theory holds that omissive causes, enabling conditions, and preventions each refer to distinct sets of possibilities. For any such causal relation, reasoners typically simulate one initial possibility, but they are able to consider alternative possibilities through deliberation. These alternative possibilities allow them to deliberate over finer-grained distinctions when reasoning about causes and effects. Hence, reasoners should be able to distinguish between omissive causes and omissive enabling conditions. Four experiments corroborated the predictions of the theory. We describe them and contrast the results with the predictions of alternative accounts of causal representation and inference.

No abstract

We report novel findings from experiments on the enumeration of canonical patterns under attentional load. While previous studies have shown that the process of enumerating randomized arrangements can be disrupted by attentional load, the effect of attentional load on canonical patterns has been unexplored. To investigate this case, we adapted a spatial dual-task paradigm previously used to study attentional disruption during the enumeration of randomized arrangements. We begin by replicating previous findings for randomized arrangements, with enumeration error increasing with cluster numerosity and attentional load. For dice patterns, enumeration error also increased under attentional load. However, contrary to findings from studies on single-task enumeration of dice patterns, we observed conflation of patterns with similar outlines. In subsequent experiments, we manipulated the spatial location of the enumeration task, placing the dot cluster in the center. With centrally located, canonical patterns that remained in the same location across trials, enumeration accuracy was more consistent with results from single-task studies. We hypothesize that participants may be using shape cues to inform guessing during enumeration tasks when unable to both localize and fully attend to target patterns.