International migration has changed the demographics and dynamics of Australia's population since European settlement. It continues to be a principal driver in the growth of its cities, including a projected doubling of major city populations by mid‐century. The influence of migrants on metropolitan housing markets—and urban consumption more generally—has been significant, and the socio‐spatial influence of migration in Australia has been the focus of regular geographical research. Less researched is the impact that “importing” half of the nation's population growth each year has on consumption of urban resources and environmental impact, including via housing consumption practices. Evidence has also been lacking on changed consumption behaviours of migrants moving from developing to developed, high‐income societies—a barometer, perhaps, of a future trajectory of consumption within developing societies. The largest cohort of recent immigrants to Australian cities has been from China, and this trend can be expected to continue. This paper focuses on a comparison of urban consumption patterns (with particular focus on housing) among a group of 61 China‐born households prior to their migration to Melbourne post‐1995 and following their settlement in an established middle‐ring suburb of Melbourne (Box Hill). Using ecological footprint as the metric of consumption, results are striking. Not only do China‐born migrants “catch up” to Australian levels of urban consumption but they also surpass it in many cases. Findings are examined in relation to housing and urban context and a range of household sociocultural factors.
Individuals from different ethnic groups behave differently in everyday living contexts, and culture can be an explanatory factor. Cultural influence can be explored in terms of indicators such as ethnicity, language, religion, food, and cultural festivals and practices. These not only depict the reinforcement of both the visible and the invisible parts of culture, but also why there are variabilities in domestic practices such as the food consumed by individuals from different ethnic groups and the way religious practices impact on everyday activities. This paper calls for a better understanding of cultural influence on individuals' behaviours. It establishes the groundwork for a CALD (culturally and linguistically diverse) Index as a means of exploring the influence of cultural contexts, both CALD and Australian-born, on everyday living and resource consumption in Australia's multicultural society.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.