Background Skeletal-related events (SREs) including pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation to bone and surgery to bone, are common in men with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Men with mCRPC are at high risk of death. Whether SREs predict mortality is unclear. We tested the association between SREs and overall survival (OS) in a multiethnic cohort with bone mCRPC, controlling for key covariates unavailable in claims data such as bone pain, number of bone metastases, and PSA doubling time (PSADT). Methods We collected data on 233 men diagnosed with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in 2000–2013 at two Veterans Affairs hospitals who later progressed to bone metastases. First occurrence of SRE and OS were collected from the medical records. Cox models were used to test the association between SRE and OS, treating SRE as a time-dependent variable. We adjusted for age, year, race, treatment center, biopsy Gleason, primary treatment to the prostate, PSA, PSADT, months from androgen deprivation therapy to CRPC, months from CRPC to metastasis and number of bone metastases at initial bone metastasis diagnosis. In a secondary analysis, we also adjusted for bone pain. Results During follow-up, 88 (38%) patients had an SRE and 198 (85%) died. After adjusting for risk factors, SRE was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio (HR) =1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22–2.30; P = 0.001). When bone pain was added to the model, the association of SREs and OS was attenuated, but remained significant (HR=1.42; 95% CI 1.01–1.99; P= 0.042). Conclusions SREs are associated with increased mortality in men with bone mCRPC. Further studies on the impact of preventing SREs to increase survival are warranted.

Despite exhibiting pulmonary hypertension-related symptoms, many pulmonary embolism patients did not undergo imaging tests that could diagnose pulmonary hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. This study suggests that physician education about the risk of pulmonary hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism may need to be improved.

BackgroundGroup 3 pulmonary hypertension (PH) encompasses PH owing to lung diseases and/or hypoxia. Treatment patterns, healthcare resource use, and economic burden to US payers of Group 3 PH patients were assessed.MethodsThis retrospective observational study extracted data from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2013 from two Truven Health Analytics MarketScan databases. Adult Group 3 PH patients were identified based on claims for PH (ICD-9-CM 416.0/416.8), a related lung disease, and an echocardiogram or right heart catheterization (RHC). The index date was the date of the first PH claim; data were collected for 12 months pre- and post-index. A difference-in-difference approach using generalized estimating equations was done to account for baseline differences.ResultsGroup 3 PH patients (n = 2,236) were matched 1:1 to controls on lung disease. PH patients had higher all-cause resource utilization and annual healthcare costs ($44,732 vs. $7,051) than controls. Costs were driven by inpatient admissions (35.4% of total costs), prescriptions (33.0%), and outpatient care (26.5%). Respiratory-related costs accounted for 11.4% of post-index annual costs for PH patients. PH diagnosis was not confirmed in the majority of PH patients (<7% RHC use) but nevertheless, 22% of PH patients post-index had claims for drugs approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).ConclusionsGroup 3 PH poses a significant clinical and economic burden. Given the low use of RHC and the prevalence of PAH-indicated prescriptions that are not currently approved for Group 3 PH, this study suggests some Group 3 PH patients may not be receiving guideline-recommended treatment.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-017-0399-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Sponsorship for this review and article processing charges were funded by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals. Divers and Platt are employees of Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals. Wang is an employee of Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and owns stock in the company. Lin and Lingohr-Smith are employees of Novosys Health, which received research funds from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals in connection with conducting this review and developing this manuscript. Mathai is a consultant to Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and also reports consulting fees from Actelion and Gilead. Study concept and design were contributed by Divers, Platt, Lin, and Mathai. Lin and Lingohr-Smith collected the data, and data interpretation was performed by Divers, Platt, Wang, and Matthai. The manuscript was written primarily by Lingohr-Smith, with assistance from the other authors, and revised by Divers, Platt, Wang, and Mathai.

No abstract