Transverse myelitis is an acute inflammatory disease of the spinal cord, characterized by rapid onset of bilateral neurological symptoms. Weakness, sensory disturbance, and autonomic dysfunction evolve over hours or days, most progressing to maximal clinical severity within 10 days of onset. At maximal clinical severity, half will have a paraparesis, and almost all patients have sensory disturbance and bladder dysfunction. Residual disability is divided equally between severe, moderate and minimal or none. The causes of transverse myelitis are diverse; etiologies implicated include demyelinating conditions, collagen vascular disease, and parainfectious causes, however, despite extensive diagnostic work-up many cases are considered idiopathic. Due to heterogeneity in pathogenesis, and the similarity of its clinical presentation with those of various noninflammatory myelopathies, transverse myelitis has frequently been viewed as a diagnostic dilemma. However, as targeted therapies to optimize patient outcome develop, timely identification of the underlying etiology is becoming increasingly important. In this review, we describe the imaging and clinical features of idiopathic and disease-associated transverse myelitis and its major differentials, with discussion of how MR imaging features assist in the identification of various sub-types of transverse myelitis. We will also discuss the potential for advanced MR techniques to contribute to diagnosis and prognostication.

Objective: To investigate the relationship between aspirin resistance and clinical and neuroimaging measures of stroke severity in acute stroke patients. Design: Prospective single-center survey of acute ischemic stroke patients receiving aspirin therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Antiplatelet therapy is associated with decreased ischemic events after neurointerventional procedures. Antiplatelet resistance negates the protective effects of antiplatelet medication, leading to a higher incidence of ischemic events. A possible link between antiplatelet hyper-response and increased hemorrhagic complications has been inadequately investigated. We aimed to examine the correlation between antiplatelet hyper-response and the risk of hemorrhagic complications.

A combined endoscopic-laparoscopic approach provides an alternative to segmental resection for treating challenging colonic polyps. This approach appears to be safe and effective and should be offered to selected patients with benign colonic polyps.

Background In patients with recurrent glioblastoma, the benefit of bevacizumab beyond progression remains uncertain. We prospectively evaluated continuing or ceasing bevacizumab in patients who progressed while on bevacizumab. Methods CABARET, a phase II study, initially randomized patients to bevacizumab with or without carboplatin (Part 1). At progression, eligible patients underwent a second randomization to continue or cease bevacizumab (Part 2). They could also receive additional chemotherapy regimens (carboplatin, temozolomide, or etoposide) or supportive care. Results Of 120 patients treated in Part 1, 48 (80% of the anticipated 60-patient sample size) continued to Part 2. Despite randomization, there were some imbalances in patient characteristics. The best response was stable disease in 7 (30%) patients who continued bevacizumab and 2 (8%) patients who stopped receiving bevacizumab. There were no radiological responses. Median progression-free survival was 1.8 vs 2.0 months (bevacizumab vs no bevacizumab; hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% CI, .59–1.96; P = .81). Median overall survival was 3.4 vs 3.0 months (HR, .84; 95% CI, .47–1.50; P = .56 and HR .70; 95% CI .38–1.29; P = .25 after adjustment for baseline factors). Quality-of-life scores did not significantly differ between arms. While the maximum daily steroid dose was lower in the continuation arm, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions Patients who continued bevacizumab beyond disease progression did not have clear survival improvements, although the study was not powered to detect other than very large differences. While these data provide the only randomized evidence related to continuing bevacizumab beyond progression in recurrent glioblastoma, the small sample size precludes definitive conclusions and suggests this remains an open question.