The positron-emitter-labeled glucose analogue 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) accumulates into many cancers after intravenous injection, but the effect of serum glucose levels on FDG uptake in the tumor has not been extensively studied. In vitro, elevated media glucose levels markedly diminished FDG and FDG 6-phosphate uptake and retention in human adenocarcinoma cells, while insulin had no effect. Mammary cancers were established subcutaneously in 12 rats. Six control rats with mammary tumors were fasted overnight. Hyperglycemia was established in six rats by means of continuous glucose infusion (glucose clamp). All animals were then intravenously administered 50 microCi of FDG. Serum glucose levels were 87 mg/dL (4.83 mmol/L) in the control animals and more than 900 mg/dL (49.9 mmol/L) in the hyperglycemic animals. One hour after injection of FDG, mean F-18 uptake in the tumor, brain, small bowel, and ovaries was 2.7-9.7 times lower in the hyperglycemic animals (P less than .02). Mean F-18 activity in the kidneys tended to be somewhat higher in the hyperglycemic animals. FDG uptake in other tissues was comparable between the control and hyperglycemic groups. These data suggest that high serum glucose levels may substantially impair visceral tumor imaging with FDG positron emission tomography.
We report that VNS may benefit from improved stimulation delivery using very advanced technologies. However, most of the results from fundamental animal studies still need to be demonstrated in humans.
Acute vagal stimulation modifies glucose and insulin metabolism, but the effect of chronic bilateral vagal stimulation is not known. Our aim was to quantify the changes in whole-body and organ-specific insulin sensitivities 12 weeks after permanent, bilateral, vagal stimulation performed at the abdominal level in adult mini-pigs. In 15 adult mini-pigs, stimulating electrodes were placed around the dorsal and ventral vagi using laparoscopy and connected to a dual-channel stimulator placed subcutaneously. Animals were divided into three groups based on stimulation and body weight (i.e., lean nonstimulated, obese nonstimulated, and obese stimulated). Twelve weeks after surgery, glucose uptake and insulin sensitivity were measured using positron emission tomography during an isoglycemic clamp. Mean whole-body insulin sensitivity was lower by 34% ( < 0.01) and the hepatic glucose uptake rate was lower by 33% ( < 0.01) in obese-nonstimulated mini-pigs but was no different in obese-stimulated compared with lean mini-pigs. An improvement in skeletal glucose uptake rate was also observed in obese-stimulated compared with obese-nonstimulated groups ( < 0.01). Vagal stimulation was associated with increased glucose metabolism in the cingulate and prefrontal brain areas. We conclude that chronic vagal stimulation improves insulin sensitivity substantially in diet-induced obesity by both peripheral and central mechanisms.
The preliminary results showed the rightness of the simulation, using a generic nerve geometry. It suggested that this approach will have broader applications that would benefit from multicontact cuff electrodes to elicit selective responses. In the context of the vagus nerve stimulation for heart failure therapy, we show that the simulation results were confirmed and improved the therapy while decreasing the side effects.
Although the therapeutic effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) have been recognized in pre-clinical and pilot clinical studies, the effect of different stimulation configurations on the cardiovascular response is still an open question, especially in the case of VNS delivered synchronously with cardiac activity. In this paper, we propose a formal mathematical methodology to analyze the acute cardiac response to different VNS configurations, jointly considering the chronotropic, dromotropic and inotropic cardiac effects. A latin hypercube sampling method was chosen to design a uniform experimental plan, composed of 75 different VNS configurations, with different values for the main parameters (current amplitude, number of delivered pulses, pulse width, interpulse period and the delay between the detected cardiac event and VNS onset). These VNS configurations were applied to 6 healthy, anesthetized sheep, while acquiring the associated cardiovascular response. Unobserved VNS configurations were estimated using a Gaussian process regression (GPR) model. In order to quantitatively analyze the effect of each parameter and their combinations on the cardiac response, the Sobol sensitivity method was applied to the obtained GPR model and inter-individual sensitivity markers were estimated using a bootstrap approach. Results highlight the dominant effect of pulse current, pulse width and number of pulses, which explain respectively 49.4%, 19.7% and 6.0% of the mean global cardiovascular variability provoked by VNS. More interestingly, results also quantify the effect of the interactions between VNS parameters. In particular, the interactions between current and pulse width provoke higher cardiac effects than the changes on the number of pulses alone (between 6 and 25% of the variability). Although the sensitivity of individual VNS parameters seems similar for chronotropic, dromotropic and inotropic responses, the interacting effects of VNS parameters provoke significantly different cardiac responses, showing the feasibility of a parameter-based functional selectivity. These results are of primary importance for the optimal, subject-specific definition of VNS parameters for a given therapy and may lead to new closed-loop methods allowing for the optimal adaptation of VNS therapy through time.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.