Objectives:The Enhancing the Quality of Prescribing Practices for Older Adults Discharged from the Emergency Department (EQUIPPED) medication safety program involves three core components including provider education, clinical decision support, and audit and feedback using the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria to determine potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). This study evaluated implementation of audit and feedback through a centralized informatics-based dashboard compared to academic detailing delivered one on one by an EQUIPPED champion. Methods: In a cluster-randomized study (October 2019-September 2021), eight VA emergency department (EDs) implemented either the academic detailing (n = 4) or the dashboard (n = 4) strategy for the audit and feedback component of EQUIPPED. The primary outcome was the monthly proportion of PIMs prescribed to Veterans 65 years or older at ED discharge. Poisson regression was used to evaluate the proportion of PIMs prescribed 6 months prior to EQUIPPED implementation compared to 12 months following implementation.Results: Eight VA ED sites successfully implemented the EQUIPPED program. During the 6-month baseline period, the academic detailing and dashboard sites had similar PIM prescribing rates of 8.01% for academic detailing versus 8.04% for dashboard (p = 0.90). Comparing 12 months of prescribing data after EQUIPPED implementation, the academic detailing group significantly improved PIM prescribing (7.07%) compared to the dashboard group (8.10%; odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.22, p ≤ 0.0001). Within the groups, two of the four academic detailing sites demonstrated statistically significant reductions in PIM prescribing. One of the four dashboard sites achieved nearly 50% relative reduction in PIM prescribing.

This is an Early Access article. Please select the PDF button, above, to view it.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD), as well as its common causes (e.g., diabetes and obesity), are recognized risk factors for severe COVID-19 illness. To explore whether the most common inherited cause of CKD, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), is also an independent risk factor, we studied data from the VA health system and the VA COVID-19-shared resources (e.g., ICD codes, demographics, pre-existing conditions, pre-testing symptoms, and post-testing outcomes). Among 61 COVID-19-positive ADPKD patients, 21 (34.4%) were hospitalized, 10 (16.4%) were admitted to ICU, 4 (6.6%) required ventilator, and 4 (6.6%) died by August 18, 2020. These rates were comparable to patients with other cystic kidney diseases and cystic liver-only diseases. ADPKD was not a significant risk factor for any of the four outcomes in multivariable logistic regression analyses when compared with other cystic kidney diseases and cystic liver-only diseases. In contrast, diabetes was a significant risk factor for hospitalization [OR 2.30 (1.61, 3.30), p<0.001], ICU admission [OR 2.23 (1.47, 3.42), p<0.001], and ventilator requirement [OR 2.20 (1.27, 3.88), p=0.005]. Black race significantly increased the risk for ventilator requirement [OR 2.00 (1.18, 3.44), p=0.011] and mortality [OR 1.60 (1.02, 2.51), p=0.040]. We also examined the outcome of starting dialysis after COVID-19 confirmation. The main risk factor for starting dialysis was CKD [OR 6.37 (2.43, 16.7)] and Black race [OR 3.47 (1.48, 8.1)]. After controlling for CKD, ADPKD did not significantly increase the risk for newly starting dialysis comparing with other cystic kidney diseases and cystic liver-only diseases. In summary, ADPKD did not significantly alter major COVID-19 outcomes among veterans when compared to other cystic kidney and liver patients.

ImportancePatient-level characteristics alone do not account for variation in care among US veterans with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Presently, the extent to which health care utilization and regional practice variation are associated with veterans receiving vascular assessment prior to major lower extremity amputation (LEA) is unknown.ObjectiveTo assess whether demographics, comorbidities, distance to primary care, the number of ambulatory clinic visits (primary and medical specialty care), and geographic region are associated with receipt of vascular assessment prior to LEA.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis national cohort study used US Department of Veterans Affairs’ Corporate Data Warehouse data from March 1, 2010, to February 28, 2020, for veterans aged 18 or older who underwent major LEA and who received care at Veterans Affairs facilities.ExposuresThe number of ambulatory clinic visits (primary and medical specialty care) in the year prior to LEA, geographic region of residence, and distance to primary care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcome was receipt of a vascular assessment (vascular imaging study or revascularization procedure) in the year prior to LEA.ResultsAmong 19 396 veterans, the mean (SD) age was 66.78 (10.20) years and 98.5% were male. In the year prior to LEA, 8.0% had no primary care visits and 30.1% did not have a vascular assessment. Compared with veterans with 4 to 11 primary care clinic visits, those with fewer visits were less likely to receive vascular assessment in the year prior to LEA (1-3 visits: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99). Compared with veterans who lived less than 13 miles from the closest primary care facility, those who lived 13 miles or more from the facility were less likely to receive vascular assessment (aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.95). Veterans who resided in the Midwest were most likely to undergo vascular assessment in the year prior to LEA than were those living in other regions.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, health care utilization, distance to primary care, and geographic region were associated with intensity of PAD treatment before LEA, suggesting that some veterans may be at greater risk of suboptimal PAD care practices. Development of clinical programs, such as remote patient monitoring and management, may represent potential opportunities to improve limb preservation rates and the overall quality of vascular care for veterans.

No abstract