No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The ‘best interests of the child’ is a pervasive notion in law, and the welfare discourse within which it acquires meaning has become increasingly dominant in our culture’s stock of ‘common sense’. Because this discourse positions children as dependent and vulnerable, it underpins images of children that can perpetuate the social, legal, and political marginalization of children. This paper uses the area of children and divorce to explore the ways in which this exclusion of children persists alongside both an ostensible commitment to the welfare of children and an increasingly strong rights discourse. We argue that constructions of the child as victim have both political and psychological dimensions: they serve to legitimize state intervention into ‘private’ family life, and they help assuage social anxieties about the alleged demise of ‘the family’. At an individual level, they facilitate a process whereby children can become the repository for feelings with which adults cannot cope. We then suggest that two fundamental changes are required in order to address children’s exclusion: the development of a more psychodynamically informed view of personhood and a new image of the child to inform policies.

In