Summary Home hemodialysis (HD) is an underused dialysis modality in the United States, even though it provides an efficient and probably cost-effective way to provide more frequent or longer dialysis. With the advent of newer home HD systems that are easier for patients to learn, use, and maintain, patient and provider interest in home HD is increasing. Although barriers for providers are similar to those for peritoneal dialysis, home HD requires more extensive patient training, nursing education, and infrastructure support in order to maintain a successful program. In addition, because many physicians and patients do not have experience with home HD, reluctance to start home HD programs is widespread. This in-depth review describes barriers to home HD, focusing on patients, individual physicians and practices, and dialysis facilities, and offers suggestions for how to overcome these barriers and establish a successful home HD program.

No abstract

Dialyzer reuse is limited by the clotting of blood, which blocks the fibers and reduces the membrane surface area. Clotting during treatment may also reduce dialysis efficiency and potentially decrease delivered dose, Kt/V(urea). A new dialysate containing citric acid, instead of the standard acetic acid, as the acidifying agent has become available and is associated with reduced clotting during acute dialysis treatments. The effect of citric acid dialysate on dialyzer reuse was evaluated in this prospective, controlled, multicenter study involving maintenance hemodialysis patients. A total of 105 patients from five dialysis units were switched to the new dialysate and new dialyzers. Reuse outcome on the new dialysate was compared with the reuse on the regular acetic acid containing bicarbonate dialysate (controls). The overall reuse with citrate dialysate increased significantly from 15.1 +/- 9.4 to 18 +/- 10.0 (mean +/- SD) on regular and citrate dialysate, respectively (p = 0.0003). The most significant increase was seen in those patients who had limited reuse before the switch to citrate dialysate; 51, 59, and 134% increases occurred in those with 10 to 15, 5 to 10, and < 5 reuses at controls, respectively. Interestingly, the 10 patients with 10 or fewer reuses had significantly lower Kt/V(urea) at baseline (before the switch to citric acid dialysate) than those with > 10 reuses (1.23 +/- 0.23 vs. 1.47 +/- 0.23, respectively, p = 0.009). The Kt/V(urea) increased to 1.41 +/- 0.31 after the switch in the low-reuse group but the increase did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). The results from this study show that citric acid-containing dialysate is associated with increase in dialyzer reuse and appears to be related to reduced clotting.

No abstract