No abstract

Objective Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) implantation in the US requires preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) screening for complete concentric palatal collapse (CCC) to establish treatment candidacy. We hypothesized that supine pharyngeal width (SPW) in awake patients is associated with CCC and HNS therapy outcomes. Methods Adults with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea underwent awake measurement of SPW followed by DISE screening for CCC. Eligible patients electing for HNS implantation underwent postoperative polysomnography per standard of care. Results SPW was measured in 73 patients. For SPW >20 mm, the positive likelihood ratio for absence of CCC was 6.67 with pre- and post-test odds of 6.3 and 42.0, respectively. Postoperative PSG data were available from 31 of 44 (70.5%) patients subsequently implanted with HNS. Patients with SPW >20 mm had a greater rate of HNS response than those with SPW ≤20 (62 vs 30%; P < .05). Only SPW and BMI were significantly associated with CCC and HNS response in regression models. Conclusion In a retrospective cohort study, SPW was significantly associated with CCC and postoperative apnea-hypopnea index following HNS implantation. SPW may be a viable screening tool for HNS candidacy.

Introduction COVID-19 has led to delays in providing healthcare in both emergency and non-emergency settings, especially in surgical subspecialties which rely heavily on referrals and in-person visits. Without an established telehealth infrastructure, many otorhinolaryngological departments experienced decreases in consultations. Telemedicine has attempted to bridge the gap between pre- and post-pandemic periods by creating a safe avenue of communication between otorhinolaryngologists and patients. This review hopes to address the accuracy of telemedicine in patient diagnosis and management. Methods Searches were conducted since study conception until June 30, 2022, on multiple databases including PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostic accuracy, management accuracy, kappa, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were meta-analyzed by comparing virtual visits to in-person visits (gold standard). Results Nineteen studies were included in this review. A total of 1518 patients were included across all studies. When comparing virtual visits against in-person visits, accurate diagnosis was made in 86.2% [82.1,89.9, I2 = 73.5%, P < 0.0001] of patients and management accuracy was 91.5% [86.1,95.7, I2 = 81.8%, P < 0.0001] when treating patients. Kappa value determining interrater reliability was 0.8 [0.7,0.9, I2 = 81.8%, P < 0.0001]. Conclusion Our data suggest that diagnostic and management concordance is above 80% when comparing diagnosis and management strategies in patients who underwent both telehealth and in-person visits with an otorhinolaryngologist. In uncomplicated patients, telehealth might be a reliable source for diagnosis and management however, in-person consultation is likely still required for pathologies in which physical exam, imaging or procedural elements represent a vital component of the work-up.

Objectives: To perform a systematic review of otolaryngologic presentation rates to emergency department settings before and after lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Sources: PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL. Methods: A systematic search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) for studies describing otolaryngologic presentations to emergency department and rapid access clinic settings both in the before-lockdown and after-lockdown periods. The start of after-lockdown period varied based on initiation of lockdown, ranging from March 1st to June 1st of 2020 across general emergency department studies. Results: A total of 14 studies were included in this review. About 10 were general emergency departments, 3 were specifically pediatric emergency departments, and 1 study focused on the geriatric population (>65 years). A total of 13 790 patients were included, with 9446 in the before-lockdown period (68.5%) and 4344 in the after-lockdown period (31.5%). Meta-analysis of proportions for otolaryngologic presentations across general emergency departments was performed. Comparison of weighted proportions found significant differences between before-lockdown and after-lockdown presentation rates for infectious etiologies, tonsillitis specifically, foreign bodies, non-infectious airway issues, and epistaxis among these studies. Conclusions: The increased proportions of various non-infectious presentations (eg, epistaxis, foreign bodies, and airway issues) following lockdown might be associated with proportional decreases in infectious pathologies, given decreased social contact to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Overall, it is important for otolaryngologists to recognize what presentations might more commonly be seen and require evaluation and potential intervention in light of a global pandemic.