The UK open access (OA) policy landscape simultaneously preferences Gold publishing models (Finch Report, RCUK, COAF) and Green OA through repository usage (HEFCE), creating the possibility of confusion and duplication of effort for academics and support staff. Alongside these policy developments, there has been an increase in open science services that aim to provide global data on OA. These services often exist separately to locally managed institutional systems for recording OA engagement and policy compliance. The aim of this study is to enhance Brunel University London's local publication data using software which retrieves and processes information from the global open science services of Sherpa REF, CORE, and Unpaywall. The study draws on two classification schemes; a 'best location' hierarchy, which enables us to measure publishing trends and whether open access dissemination has taken place, and a relational 'all locations' dataset to examine whether individual publications appear across multiple OA dissemination models. Sherpa REF data is also used to indicate possible OA locations from serial policies. Our results find that there is an average of 4.767 permissible open access options available to the authors in our sample each time they publish and that Gold OA publications are replicated, on average, in 3 separate locations. A total of 40% of OA works in the sample are available in both Gold and Green locations. The study considers whether this tendency for duplication is a result of localised manual workflows which are necessarily focused on institutional compliance to meet the Research Excellence Framework 2021 requirements, and suggests that greater interoperability between OA systems and services would facilitate a more efficient transformation to open scholarship.

No abstract

No abstract

examination of the impact of nuclear issues upon individual experience in Britain during the 1950s is a valuable piece of research into a period of Cold War history that has predominantly been considered through the American postwar suburban experience. Hogg begins by recalling an event in 1957 where Elsie and Andrew Marshall gassed their three children before entering into a suicide pact and jumping into the sea. Hogg then notes how a subsequent article in the Daily Mirror entitled "The family that feared tomorrow" outlined the contents of the suicide note, which cited the threat of human extermination as a key factor in the couples' actions. This incident, Hogg argues, provides a powerful example of how developing nuclear technologies produced a wide-range of cultural and personal responses while also demonstrating how "profound preoccupations with nuclear danger straddled class boundaries" (536). Hogg's article therefore utilises Gabrielle Hecht's (2006) use of the term 'nuclearity' (Hecht uses it to refer to the extent to which a nation is classed as 'nuclear') but re-appropriates it to reveal "the shifting set of assumptions held by individual citizens on the dangers of nuclear technology, assumptions that were rooted firmly in context and which circulated in, and were shaped by, national discourse" (537). 'Nuclearity' thus becomes a way of assessing the degree to which the nuclear referent was encoded within cultural activities.Following on from these initial observations, Hogg's first sub-heading "Rational anxieties" sets out the extent of public understanding on nuclear issues, noting that by the close of the 1950s "every adult in Britain had some knowledge of atomic bombs" (538), with individuals aware of "the instantaneous and lasting damage that atomic and thermonuclear weapons could inflict on themselves and their loved ones" (538). Hogg then insightfully sets out his position in relation to a selection of academic writings on nuclear threat, providing a thoughtful critique of Frank Kermode's argument in The Sense of an Ending (1967) that there are distinct similarities between modern fears of nuclear apocalypse and those of the ancient world. Hogg counters Kermode by observing the historical specificity of nuclear anxiety, which is "uniquely modern in that it is a response to a man-made threat of unprecedented magnitude" (539). Extending this argument, Hogg moves on to survey a variety of cultural responses to the thermonuclear era in fifties Britain, listing a collection of science fiction productions -notably Nigel Kneale's The Quatermass Experiment (1953) and J.B. Priestley's Doomsday for Dyson (1958) -as well as, fascinatingly, the giveaway of toy atomic submarines in packs of Cornflakes in 1957, which highlighted how "popular discourse was already dependent on a range of assumptions over the excitement and awe surrounding nuclear technology" (541). In picking out varying cultural phenomena Hogg therefore demonstrates the ways "nuclear culture coloured day-to-day life" (542) through various m...

No abstract