BackgroundDisasters have the potential to cause critical shortages of life-saving equipment. It has been postulated that during patient surge, multiple individuals could be maintained on a single ventilator. This was supported by a previous trial that showed one ventilator could support four sheep. The goal of our study is to investigate if cross contamination of pathological agents occurs between individuals on a shared ventilator with strategically placed antimicrobial filters.MethodsA multipatient ventilator circuit was assembled using four sterile, parallel standard tubing circuits attached to four 2 L anaesthesia bags, each representing a simulated patient. Each ‘patient’ was attached to a Heat and Moisture Exchange filter. An additional bacterial/viral filter was attached to each expiratory limb. ‘Patient-Lung’ number 1 was inoculated with an isolate of Serratia marcescens, and the circuit was run for 24 hours. Each ‘lung’ and three points in the expiratory limb tubing were washed with broth and cultured. All cultures were incubated for 48 hours with subcultures performed at 24 hours.ResultsWashed cultures of patient 2, 3 and 4 failed to demonstrate growth of S. marcescens. Cultures of the distal expiratory tubing, expiratory limb connector and expiratory limb prefilter tubing yielded no growth of S. marcescens at 24 or 48 hours.ConclusionBased on this circuit configuration, it is plausible to maintain four individuals on a single ventilator for 24 hours without fear of cross contamination.

No abstract

Introduction:During the COVID-19 pandemic, consideration was given to co-ventilating multiple patients on a single ventilator. Prior work had shown that this procedure was possible by ventilating four adult-size sheep for twenty-four hours, and other groups had performed this maneuver during dire circumstances. However, no investigation had examined the safety regarding cross-contamination. The purpose of our studies was to investigate if an infection could spread between individuals who were being co-ventilated.Method:Four sterile two-liter anesthesia bags were connected to a sterilized ventilator circuit to simulate the co-ventilated patients’ “lungs.” The circuit utilized Heat and Moisture Exchange filters and bacterial/viral filters, which were strategically inserted to prevent the transmission of infectious droplets. Serratia marcescens was inoculated into “lung” number one. The circuit was then run for 24 hours, after which each “lung” and three additional points in the circuit were cultured to see if S. marcescens had spread. These cultures were examined at 24 and 48 hours to assess for cross-contamination. This entire procedure was performed a total of four times.Results:S. marcescens was not identified in lungs two, three, or four or the three additional sampling sites on the expiratory limb of the tubing at 24 and 48 hours in all four trials.Conclusion:Cross-contamination between co-ventilated patients did not occur within 24 hours utilizing the described ventilator circuit configuration.