Introduction Penetrating and perforating ocular trauma are often devastating and may lead to complete visual loss in the traumatized eye and subsequent compromise of the fellow eye. A significant proportion of traumatic injuries are complex, often requiring vitreoretinal intervention to preserve vision. A retrospective analysis at a level 1 trauma center was performed to evaluate the time course, incidence, and outcomes following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) after traumatic ocular injury and initial globe repair. Materials and Methods Eyes that underwent open globe repair following ocular trauma at Brooke Army Medical Center, between January 1, 2014 and December 30, 2016 were analyzed. Specific factors evaluated include mechanism of injury, defect size and complexity, ocular trauma score, zone of injury, associated orbital trauma, and time from injury to surgical intervention. A subset analysis was conducted specifically on eyes requiring subsequent PPV for vision preservation because of vitreoretinal disease. Surgical outcomes, time to secondary intervention, and complication rates were then assessed. Results In total, 70 eyes requiring open globe repair were examined, with 43 having undergone PPV. Average and median time to vitrectomy were 18.8 and 8 days, respectively. Eyes that underwent PPV were more likely to have an afferent papillary defect, vitreous hemorrhage, intraocular foreign body, and retinal detachment at the time of initial injury (although the latter two factors were not statistically significant), and were more likely to receive penetrating keratoplasty. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy occurred in 37.2% of eyes that underwent PPV, versus 3.7% of those that did not (P = 0.0013). Timing of PPV (i.e., before or after 14 days) had no statistically significant effect on the rate of PVR (Table I). Eyes that underwent PPV showed an improvement of visual acuity from average 2.5 logMAR following initial injury to 1.5 logMAR 6 months after PPV, equivalent to 18.7 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters gained, versus 37.7 ETDRS letters gained in eyes without PPV. Among PPV eyes, early repair (<14 days) was associated with greater improvement in visual acuity. Conclusion Overall, patients requiring PPV following open globe repair generally had more severe injuries and worse 6-month postoperative visual acuity. Patients who underwent more expedited vitrectomy showed greater improvement in visual acuity as measured by ETDRS letters gained.
IntroductionIndividual Critical Task Lists (ICTLs) are a list of requirements set forth by the United States Army which each soldier must fulfill to maintain competency in a specialty. By providing senior leadership objective criteria with which to evaluate the competency of each service member, ICTLs support commanders in ensuring that soldiers are mission ready and deployable. Board-certified ophthalmologists can meet ICTL requirements by demonstrating skills on an actual patient, a simulator, and/or cadaveric or live tissue. We sought to determine the availability of simulators that can be used to meet Army ophthalmology ICTL requirements.MethodsWe reviewed the current Army ICTLs for ophthalmologists. We performed an online search, as well as an extensive review of Pubmed, AccessMedicine, Academic Search Elite, Thieme, and ScienceDirect, to identify available simulators for each ICTL. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on April 27, 2019.ResultsArmy Ophthalmologists are required to maintain current status in 19 areas based on ICTLs established by the Critical Task Site and Selection Board. Eight of these requirements are not amenable to a simulation of any kind. Of the 11 remaining ICTLs, approximately 82% can be satisfied with a simulator alone based on current simulator availability. The remaining 18% of applicable ICTLs can be satisfied using cadaveric or live tissue training.ConclusionsArmy ophthalmologists can keep current with their ICTLs, and thus maintain mission readiness, by using either simulators or cadaveric or live tissues. This is particularly important for ophthalmologists who are either located in remote or austere locations without resources or areas with low surgical volumes. Several tasks are applicable to other medical specialties which can benefit from the same simulators.
Introduction We describe results of the U.S. Army Ocular Teleconsultation program from 2004 through 2018 as well as the current condition, benefits, barriers, and future opportunities for teleophthalmology in the clinical settings and disease areas specific to the U.S. Military. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective, noncomparative, consecutive case series. A total of 653 ocular teleconsultations were reviewed; 76 concerned general policy questions and underwent initial screening to determine the year each request was received, the average and median initial consultant response time, the number of participating consultants, the country from which the request originated, the military status and branch of each U.S. patient for which a request was submitted, and the nationality, age, and military status of foreign patients for whom consults were requested. The remaining 577 requests were further analyzed to determine the diagnostic category of the request, whether or not an evacuation recommendation was provided by a consultant, the relationship of the request to trauma, if and what type of nonocular specialty consultant(s) participated in the consultation request, and if and what type of ancillary imaging accompanied the request. Results The number of requests was 13 in 2004, compared to 80 in 2011 and 11 in 2018. The average response time in 2018 was 2.27 hours compared to 9. 73 hours in 2004. The number of participating ocular specialists was 5 in 2004, compared to 39 in 2013 and 13 in 2018. Requests originating from Iraq and Afghanistan comprised 61.1% (399/653) of requests. The U.S. Army personnel comprised the largest percentage of consults at 38.6% (252/653). Nonmilitary patients from the USA accounted for 18.5% (121/653) of consults. Non-U.S. patients including coalition forces, contractors, detainees, and noncombatants accounted for 14.4% (94/653) of consults, of which 22% (21/94) were children. Anterior segment consults accounted for 45.1% (260/577) of consults, with corneal surface disease being the largest subset within this diagnostic category. Evacuation was recommended in 22.7% (131/577) of overall cases and 41.1% (39/95) of trauma cases. Requests were associated with either combat-related or accidental trauma in 16.5% (95/577) of cases. Dermatology and neurology were the most commonly co-consulted specialties, representing 40.0% (32/80) and 33.75% (27/80) of consults, respectively. Photographs of suspected ocular pathology accompanied 37.4% of consults, with the likelihood requesters included photographs being greatest in cases involving pediatric ophthalmology (7/9, 77.8%) and oculoplastics (86/120, 71.7%). Conclusions Army teleophthalmology has been an indispensable resource in supporting and advancing military medicine, helping to optimize the quality, efficiency, and accessibility of ophthalmic care for U.S. Military personnel, beneficiaries, allied forces, and local nationals worldwide. A dedicated ophthalmic care and coordination system which utilizes new advances in teleconsultation technology could further enhance our current capability to care for the ophthalmic needs of patients abroad, with opportunity for improving domestic care as well.
Corneal collagen cross-linking is a minimally invasive therapeutic technique indicated for the treatment of keratoectasia. Recently, it has also been utilized for a variety of other ophthalmologic conditions ranging from infectious keratitis to corneal edema. We report the novel application of corneal collagen cross-linking in the treatment of recurrent corneal erosions secondary to wound gaping after astigmatic keratotomy (AK).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.