The yeast protein Rad23 belongs to a diverse family of proteins that contain an amino-terminal ubiquitin-like (UBL) domain. This domain mediates the binding of Rad23 to proteasomes, which in turn promotes DNA repair and modulates protein degradation, possibly by delivering ubiquitinylated cargo to proteasomes. Here we show that Rad23 binds proteasomes by directly interacting with the base subcomplex of the regulatory particle of the proteasome. A component of the base, Rpn1, specifically recognizes the UBL domain of Rad23 through its leucine-rich-repeat-like (LRR-like) domain. A second UBL protein, Dsk2, competes with Rad23 for proteasome binding, which suggests that the LRR-like domain of Rpn1 may participate in the recognition of several ligands of the proteasome. We propose that the LRR domain of Rpn1 may be positioned in the base to allow the cargo proteins carried by Rad23 to be presented to the proteasomal ATPases for unfolding. We also report that, contrary to expectation, the base subunit Rpn10 does not mediate the binding of UBL proteins to the proteasome in yeast, although it can apparently contribute to the binding of ubiquitin chains by intact proteasomes.

A necessary step in ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis is the addition of a polyubiquitin chain to the target protein. This ubiquitinated protein is degraded by a multisubunit complex known as the 26S proteasome. The polyubiquitin chain is probably not released until a late stage in the proteolysis by the proteasome. It is subsequently disassembled to yield functional ubiquitin monomers. Here we present evidence that a 93 kDa protein, isopeptidase T, has the properties expected for the enzyme which disassembles these branched polyubiquitin chains. Protein and cDNA sequencing revealed that isopeptidase T is a member of the ubiquitin specific protease family (UBP). Isopeptidase T disassembles branched polyubiquitin chains (linked by the G76-K48 isopeptide bond) by a sequential exo mechanism, starting at the proximal end of the chain (the proximal ubiquitin contains a free carboxyl-terminus). Isopeptidase T prefers to disassemble chains in which there is an intact and unblocked RGG sequence at the C-terminus of the proximal subunit. Rates of disassembly are reduced when G76 of the proximal ubiquitin is modified, for example, by ligation to substrate protein, by esterification, by replacement of the proximal glycine with alanine (G76A), or by truncation. Linear proubiquitin is only a poor substrate. Observed rates and specificity are consistent with isopeptidase T playing a major role in disassembly of polyubiquitin chains. The high discrimination against chains that are blocked or modified at the proximal end indicates that the enzyme acts after release of the chains from conjugated proteins or degradation intermediates. Thus, the proteolytic degradation signal is not disassembled by isopeptidase T before the ubiquitinated protein is degraded. These (and earlier) results suggest that UBP isozymes may exhibit significant substrate specificity, consistent with a role in the regulated catabolism of the polymeric ubiquitin, including the polyubiquitin protein degradation signal.

Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases (UCH) are deubiquitinating enzymes which hydrolyze C-terminal esters and amides of ubiquitin. Here we report the processing of a number of ubiquitin derivatives by two human UCH isozymes (isozymes L1 and L3) and find that these enzymes show little discrimination based on the P1' amino acid, except that proline is cleaved slowly. Ubiquitinyllysine derivatives linked by the alpha- or epsilon-amino group are hydrolyzed at identical rates. Isozyme-specific hydrolytic preferences are only evident when the leaving group is large. The ubiquitin gene products can be cotranslationally processed by one or both of these UCH isozymes, and purified UbCEP52 can be hydrolyzed by UCH isozyme L3. Binding of nucleic acid by UbCEP52 converts it to a form resistant to processing by these enzymes, apparently because of the formation of a larger, more tightly folded substrate. Consistent with this postulate is the observation that these enzymes do not hydrolyze large ubiquitin derivatives such as N epsilon-ubiquitinyl-cytochrome-c, N epsilon-K48polyubiquitinyl-lysozyme, or an N alpha-ubiquitinyl-beta-galactosidase fusion protein. Thus, these enzymes rapidly and preferentially cleave small leaving groups such as amino acids and oligopeptides from the C-terminus of ubiquitin, but not larger leaving groups such as proteins. These data suggest that the physiological role of UCH is to hydrolyze small adducts of ubiquitin and to generate free monomeric ubiquitin from ubiquitin proproteins, but not to deubiquitinate ubiquitin-protein conjugates or disassemble polyubiquitin chains.

A family of ATPases resides within the regulatory particle of the proteasome. These proteins (Rpt1-Rpt6) have been proposed to mediate substrate unfolding, which may be required for translocation of substrates through the channel that leads from the regulatory particle into the proteolytic core particle. To analyze the role of ATP hydrolysis in protein breakdown at the level of the individual ATPase, we have introduced equivalent site-directed mutations into the ATPbinding motif of each RPT gene. Non-conservative substitutions of the active-site lysine were lethal in four of six cases, and conferred a strong growth defect in two cases. Thus, the ATPases are not functionally redundant, despite their multiplicity and sequence similarity. Degradation of a specific substrate can be inhibited by ATP-binding-site substitutions in many of the Rpt proteins, indicating that they co-operate in the degradation of individual substrates. The phenotypic defects of the different rpt mutants were strikingly varied. The most divergent phenotype was that of the rpt1 mutant, which was strongly growth defective despite showing no general defect in protein turnover. In addition, rpt1 was unique among the rpt mutants in displaying a G1 cell-cycle defect. Proteasomes purified from an rpt2 mutant showed a dramatic inhibition of peptidase activity, suggesting a defect in gating of the proteasome channel. In summary, ATP promotes protein breakdown by the proteasome through multiple mechanisms, as reflected by the diverse phenotypes of the rpt mutants.