Saccades that consistently over- or undershoot their targets gradually become smaller or larger, respectively. The signal that elicits adaptation of saccade size is a difference between eye and target positions appearing repeatedly at the ends of saccades. Here we describe how visual error size affects the size of saccade adaptation. At the end of each saccade, we imposed a constant-sized error by moving the target to a specified point relative to eye position. We tested a variety of error sizes imposed after saccades to target movements of 6, 12, and 18 degrees. We found that the size of the gain change elicited in a particular experiment depended on both the size of the imposed postsaccade error and on the size of the preceding target movement. For example, imposed errors of 4-5 degrees reduce saccades tracking 6, 12, and 18 degrees target movements by an average of 18, 35, and 45%, respectively. The most effective errors were those that were 15-45% of the size of the initial target eccentricity. Negative errors, which reduce saccade size, were more effective in changing saccade gain than were positive errors, which increased saccade size. For example, for 12 degrees target movements, negative and positive errors of 2-6 degrees changed saccade gain an average of 35 and 8%, respectively. This description of the relationship between error size and adaptation size improves our ability to adapt saccades in the laboratory and characterizes the error sizes that will best drive neurons carrying the adaptation-related visual error signal.

The gain of saccadic eye movements can be altered gradually by moving targets either forward or backward during targeting saccades. If the gain of saccades to targets of only one size is adapted, the gain change generalizes or transfers only to saccades with similar vectors. In this study, we examined the spatial extent of such saccadic size adaptation, i.e., the gain adaptation field. We also attempted to adapt saccade direction by moving the target orthogonally during the targeting saccade to document the extent of a direction or cross-axis adaptation field. After adaptive gain decreases of horizontal saccades to 15 degrees target steps, >82% of the gain reduction transferred to saccades to 25 degrees horizontal target steps but only approximately 30% transferred to saccades to 5 degrees steps. For the horizontal component of oblique saccades to target steps with 15 degrees horizontal components and 10 degrees upward or downward vertical components, the transfer was similar at 51 and 60%, respectively. Thus the gain decrease adaptation field was quite asymmetric in the horizontal dimension but symmetric in the vertical dimension. Although gain increase adaptation produced a smaller gain change (13% increase for a 30% forward adapting target step) than did gain decrease adaptation (20% decrease for a 30% backward adapting target step), the spatial extent of gain transfer was quite similar. In particular, the gain increase adaptation field displayed asymmetry in the horizontal dimension (58% transfer to 25 degrees saccades but only 32% transfer to 5 degrees saccades) and symmetry in the vertical direction (50% transfer to the horizontal component of 10 degrees upward and 40% transfer to 10 degrees downward oblique saccades). When a 5 degrees vertical target movement was made to occur during a saccade to a horizontal 10 degrees target step, a vertical component gradually appeared in saccades to horizontal targets. More than 88% of the cross-axis change in the vertical component produced in 10 degrees saccades transferred to 20 degrees saccades but only 12% transferred to 4 degrees saccades. The transfer was similar to the vertical component of oblique saccades to target steps with either 10 degrees upward (46%) or 10 degrees downward (46%) vertical components. Therefore both gain and cross-axis adaptation fields have similar spatial profiles. These profiles resemble those of movement fields of neurons in the frontal eye fields and superior colliculus. How those structures might participate in the adaptation process is considered in the DISCUSSION.

No abstract

Inaccurate saccades adapt to become more accurate. In this experiment the role of cerebellar output to the oculomotor system in adapting saccade size was investigated. We measured saccade adaptation after temporary inactivation of saccade-related neurons in the caudal part of the fastigial nucleus which projects to the oculomotor brain stem. We located caudal fastigial nucleus neurons with single unit recording and injected 0.1% muscimol among them. Two monkeys received bilateral injections and two monkeys unilateral injections. Unilateral injections made ipsiversive saccades hypermetric (gains >1.5) and contraversive saccades hypometric (gains approximately 0.6). Bilateral injections made both leftward and rightward saccades hypermetric (gains >1.5). During unilateral inactivation neither ipsiversive nor contraversive saccade size adapted after approximately 1,000 saccades. During bilateral inactivation, adaptation was either small or very slow. Most intact monkeys completely adapt after approximately 1,000 saccades to similar dysmetrias produced by intrasaccadic target displacement. After the monkeys receiving bilateral injections made >1,000 saccades in each horizontal direction, we placed them in the dark so that the muscimol dissipated without the monkeys receiving visual feedback about its saccade gain. After the dark period, 20-degree saccades were adapted to be 12% smaller, and 4-degree saccades to be 7% smaller. We expect this difference in adaptation because during caudal fastigial nucleus inactivation, monkeys made many large overshooting saccades and few small overshooting saccades. We conclude from these results that: (1) caudal fastigial nucleus activity is important in adapting dysmetric saccades; and (2) bilateral caudal fastigial nucleus inactivation impairs the relay of adapted signals to the oculomotor system, but it does not stop all adaptation from occurring.

In monkeys, saccades that repeatedly overshoot their targets adapt to become smaller by the time the monkey has made 1,000-2,000 saccades. In life, adaptation must keep movements accurate for long periods of time. Previous work describes only saccade adaptation that occurs within a few hours. Here we describe long-term saccade adaptation elicited in three monkeys by 19 days of training. Each day a monkey made saccades to track 16 degrees leftward and rightward target movements. During saccades, the target stepped back toward its starting position 6.4 degrees (40%) in two monkeys or 8 degrees (50%) in the third. After each day's adaptation, we blindfolded the monkey with goggles and returned it to its cage overnight. We found that adapting saccades for 19 days elicited significantly larger, long-lasting reduction in saccade size than did adapting for only 1 day. Further, after 19 days of adaptation we could elicit additional, apparently normal, short-term reduction in saccade size by increasing the size of the intra-saccade target movement. In contrast, we could elicit only small additional size reduction after only 1 day of adaptation. A simple model using separate short- and long-term adaptation mechanisms can reproduce many of the features of saccade gain exhibited by monkeys during a 19-day adaptation. We conclude that there is a long-term saccade-adaptation mechanism that is distinct from the well-characterized short-term system and that this newly recognized system is responsible for long-term maintenance of saccade accuracy.