The aim of the current work was to present the performance evaluation procedures implemented at our department for the commissioning of a G4 CyberKnife system. This system consists of a robotic manipulator, a target-locating system and a lightweight 6-MV linac. Individual quality assurance procedures were performed for each of the CyberKnife subsystems. The system was checked for the mechanical accuracy of its robotic manipulator. The performance of the target-locating system was evaluated in terms of mechanical accuracy of both cameras' alignment and quality assurance tests of the x-ray generators and the flat-panel detectors. The traditional linac 6-MV beam characteristics and beam output parameters were also measured. Results revealed a manipulator mechanical mean accuracy of approximately 0.1 mm, with individual maximum position uncertainties less than 0.25 mm. The target-locating system mechanical accuracy was found within the acceptance limits. For the most clinically used parameters in the CyberKnife practice, e.g. 100-120 kV and 50-200 ms, kV and exposure time accuracy error were measured as less than 2%, while the precision error of the kV was determined as less than 1%. The acquired images of the ETR grid pattern revealed no geometrical distortion while the critical frequency f50 values for cameras A and B were calculated as 1.5 lp mm(-1) and 1.4 lp mm(-1), respectively. Dose placement measurements were performed in a head and neck phantom. Results revealed sub-millimeter beam delivery precision whereas the total clinical accuracy of the system was measured equal to 0.44 +/- 0.12 mm, 0.29 +/- 0.10 mm and 0.53 +/- 0.16 mm for the skull, fiducial and Xsight spine tracking methods, respectively. The results of this work certify the G4 CyberKnife SRS system capable of delivering high dose distributions with sub-millimeter accuracy and precision to intracranial and extracranial lesions. Moreover, total clinical accuracy of the investigated G4 system was found to be improved for the skull and fiducial tracking methods and was comparable for Xsight spine tracking method compared with the earlier generation of the instrument.

An analytical Monte Carlo simulation code has been used to perform dosimetry calculations around an 192Ir high dose-rate brachytherapy source utilized in the widely used microSelectron afterloaded system. Radial dose functions, dose rate constant and anisotropy functions, utilized in the AAPM Task Group 43 dose estimation formalism, have been calculated. In addition, measurements of anisotropy functions using LiF TLD-100 rods have been performed in a polystyrene phantom to support our Monte Carlo calculations. The energy dependence of LiF TLD response was investigated over the whole range of measurement distances and angles. TLD measurements and Monte Carlo calculations are in agreement to each other and agree with published data. The influence of phantom dimensions on calculations was also investigated. Radial dose functions were found to depend significantly on phantom dimensions at radial distances near phantom edges. Deviations of up to 25% are observed at these distances due to the lack of full scattering conditions, indicating that body dimensions should be taken into account in treatment planning when the absorbed dose is calculated near body edges. On the other hand, anisotropy functions do not demonstrate a strong dependence on phantom dimensions. However, these functions depend on radial distance at angles close to the longitudinal axis of the source, where deviations of up to 20% are observed.

The comparison of Farmer chamber measurements versus alanine reference dosimetry validates the use of the former for dosimetry in the msr field of this treatment delivery system. The corresponding results of this work obtained using chambers with different cavity lengths, combined with previous literature findings, suggest that a k(Q(msr),Q)(f(msr),f(ref)) Farmer chamber dose response correction factor of 1.01 may improve calibration measurement accuracy when using the proposed dosimetric formalism. The k(Q(msr),Q)(f(msr),f(ref)) correction factor is within 0.5% from unity for ion chambers with cavity lengths less than 10 mm. Substantial improvements in small field output factor measurement accuracy can be obtained when using microchambers and diodes by applying appropriately calculated correction factors to the detector measurements according to the proposed dosimetric formalism, and their routine use is therefore recommended.

No abstract

Dose distributions registered in water equivalent, polymer gel dosimeters were used to measure the output factors and off-axis profiles of the radiosurgical photon beams employed for CyberKnife radiosurgery. Corresponding measurements were also performed using a shielded silicon diode commonly employed for CyberKnife commissioning, the PinPoint ion chamber, and Gafchromic EBT films, for reasons of comparison. Polymer gel results of this work for the output factors of the 5, 7.5, and 10 mm diameter beams are (0.702 +/- 0.029), (0.872 +/- 0.039), and (0.929 +/- 0.041), respectively. Comparison of polymer gel and diode measurements shows that the latter overestimate output factors of the two small beams (5% for the 5 mm beam and 3% for the 7.5 mm beams). This is attributed to the nonwater equivalence of the high atomic number silicon material of the diode detector. On the other hand, the PinPoint chamber is found to underestimate output factors up to 10% for the 5 mm beam due to volume averaging effects. Polymer gel and EBT film output factor results are found in close agreement for all beam sizes, emphasizing the importance of water equivalence and fine detector sensitive volume for small field dosimetry. Relative off-axis profile results are in good agreement for all dosimeters used in this work, with noticeable differences observed only in the PinPoint estimate of the 80%-20% penumbra width, which is relatively overestimated.