No abstract

Background: The introduction of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy overcame the restriction of passive capsule endoscopy movement, thus allowing an improved visualization of the gastrointestinal lumen, where other imaging studies seem to be unhelpful. The aim of this study is to systematically review the performance of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy and evaluate its potential as a less invasive diagnostic method in the detection of gastric lesions. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus, Who Global Health Library (GHL), Virtual Health Library (VHL), Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Science databases. Proportion meta-analyses were performed to estimate the pooled sensitivity of magnetically controlled capsuled endoscopy in the detection of gastrointestinal lesions. Results: Among the 3026 studies that were initially assessed, 7 studies were finally included, with a total of 916 patients and 745 gastric lesions. The mean capsule endoscopy examination time was 21.92±8.87 minutes. The pooled overall sensitivity of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy was 87% [95% confidence interval (CI), 84%-89%]. Subgroup analysis showed that the sensitivity of identifying gastric ulcers was 82% (95% CI: 71%-89%), gastric polyps was 82% (95% CI: 76%-87%), and gastric erosions was 95% (95% CI: 86%-98%). In general, magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy was well tolerated by the participants with minimal adverse events. Conclusion: The magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy demonstrated an acceptable sensitivity of identifying gastric lesions. Further prospective comparative studies are needed to identify the risks and benefits of this new technique, as well as to determine its role as a replacement for conventional gastroscopy.

Background Congenital long-QT syndrome represents the most common cardiac channelopathy and manifests as potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. Prevention strategies include beta-blockade pharmacotherapy, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and left cardiac sympathetic denervation, which can increase the threshold for ventricular fibrillation. Herein, we report our experience with video-assisted thoracoscopic left cardiac sympathetic denervation. Methods We performed a retrospective review of the electronic medical records of all patients with congenital long-QT syndrome who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic left cardiac sympathetic denervation at our institution. Results From September 2009 to May 2016, 6 patients with a mean age of 30.5 years (range 20–47 years) underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic left cardiac sympathetic denervation for medically refractory long-QT syndrome. All patients had an uneventful recovery and were discharged 1–3 days after the operation. At a median follow-up of 14 months (range 12–60 months), 4 patients had no cardiac events while 2 experienced 1 episode of arrhythmic syncope and 1 episode of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock. Following surgery, the mean annual cardiac events in the study cohort decreased from 2.13 to 0.33 ( p = 0.004) and the mean corrected QT interval reduced from 560 ms to 491 ms ( p = 0.006). Conclusions Video-assisted thoracoscopic left cardiac sympathetic denervation is a safe and effective therapy in patients with congenital long-QT syndrome who continue to suffer from recurrent life-threatening arrhythmias or frequent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharges despite maximum tolerated doses of beta blockers.

No abstract

Introduction Electronic discharge summary forms a vital part of a patient’s journey. As established in GAIN Guidelines 2011 ‘Clear and complete documentation in a patient’s health record is directly linked to the quality of the care they receive’. By improving the quality of E-Discharge summaries this will help to improve patient outcomes. Method In the Emergency surgical unit [EMSU] there are over 3500 completed consultant episodes per annum. We audited the quality of E-Discharges using 33 separate parameters included in the Trust’s dedicated discharge proforma. An E-Discharge summary was considered acceptable if >90% of the information was recorded accurately. Discharge failure rate was audited in a randomised sample of 20 discharges in November 2019 and one year later in November 2020 following implementation of specific training and teaching at induction on E-Discharge compilation. Results In November 2019 the discharge failure rate was 60%. Common failings were in general omission of data, lack of follow-up planning and inaccurate pharmaceutical arrangements. In November 2020, following dedicated teaching at induction, failure rate was 15%. Where accurate recording of demographic information and pertinent inpatient detail improved, shortcomings remained in inadequate recording of follow-up care and ongoing involvement of the primary healthcare team. Conclusions E-Discharge recording is sub-standard. It is often the remit of the least experienced member of the medical team, as is the case in our unit. We have shown that dedicated teaching and training in this area can improve the quality of discharge summaries.