Alopecia is one of the most common dermatologic conditions affecting Black patients, with a significantly negative impact on quality of life. 1,2 Timely and accurate diagnosis is therefore critical in order to reverse or halt progression of disease. 3 Unfortunately, lack of representation of skin of color (SOC) patients in the current literature may contribute to misdiagnosis as providers may be unfamiliar with the clinical spectrum of alopecia presenting in darker scalps. 4 Some scarring alopecia subtypes such as Central Centrifugal Cicatricial Alopecia (CCCA) are more prevalent in certain racial groups. However, focusing solely on patient demographics and gross clinical findings may obscure accurate diagnoses. To distinguish alopecia findings in Black patients, a dedicated approach using a combination of clinical exam findings and patient history, along with trichoscopy and biopsy, is essential to prevent misdiagnosis and improve clinical and diagnostic outcomes. We present three cases of alopecia in patients of color which the initial suspected clinical diagnosis did not correspond with trichoscopic and biopsy results. We challenge clinicians to reexamine their biases and fully evaluate patients of color with alopecia. An examination should include a thorough history, clinical examination, trichoscopy, and potentially a biopsy, particularly when findings do not correlate. Our cases highlight the challenges and disparities that exist in diagnosis of alopecia in Black patients. We emphasize the need for continued research regarding alopecia in skin of color and the importance of a complete workup for alopecia to improve diagnostic outcomes.
This cross-sectional study examines state Medicaid coverage of human papillomavirus vaccination in adults aged 27 to 45 years and discusses the implications of the results for dermatologists.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.