Objectives: To explore the connection of hypertension and severe COVID-19 outcomes.Methods: A total of 68 observational studies recording mortality and/or general severity of COVID-19 were pooled for meta-analyses of the relationship of severe COVID-19 outcomes with hypertension as well as systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Genome-wide cross-trait meta-analysis (GWCTM) was performed to explore the genes linking between hypertension and COVID-19 severity.Results: The results of meta-analysis with the random effect model indicated that pooled risk ratios of hypertension on mortality and severity of COVID-19 were 1.80 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.54–2.1] and 1.78 (95% confidence interval 1.56–2.04), respectively, although the apparent heterogeneity of the included studies was detected. In subgroup analysis, cohorts of severe and mild patients of COVID-19 assessed in Europe had a significant pooled weighted mean difference of 6.61 mmHg (95% CI 3.66–9.55) with no heterogeneity found (p = 0.26). The genes in the shared signature of hypertension and the COVID-19 severity were mostly expressed in lungs. Analysis of molecular networks commonly affected both by hypertension and by severe COVID-19 highlighted CCR1/CCR5 and IL10RB signaling, as well as Th1 and Th2 activation pathways, and also a potential for a shared regulation with multiple sclerosis.Conclusion: Hypertension is significantly associated with the severe course of COVID-19. Genetic variants within inflammation- and immunity-related genes may affect their expression in lungs and confer liability to both elevated blood pressure and to severe COVID-19.

Objective: The majority of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases remain undiagnosed until advanced stages of the disease. Accumulating studies have highlighted the utility of palliative care as an effective treatment option, which relieves patients' suffering by activating placebo effect in the body. To evaluate the clinical significance of palliative care, data from NSCLC drug-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were collected and the effects of placebo treatment examined.Methods: PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched from January 1,1978 to September 1,2020. Placebo-controlled phase II/III pharmaceutical RCTs enrolling patients with solely stage III/IV NSCLC were included. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Jadad method. Single-arm and two-arm meta-analyses of the therapeutic and adverse effects of placebo, that is, the primary and secondary outcome measures, were subsequently performed using either Bayesian or conventional models.Results: Five RCTs including 2245 drug-treated and 1510 placebo-treated patients at NSCLC stage III or IV were included for the study. Low risk of bias was observed for all five included studies using the Cochrane method. Following placebo treatment, controlled disease rate of 24.1% (95% credible interval [CrI], -0.126-0.609) and dropout rate of 2.1% (95% CrI, 0.007-0.039) were calculated, with a dose reduction rate of 3.0% (95% CrI, 0.017-0.045). Compared with active drug treatment, the placebo treatment group had a risk ratio of 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.97) and 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.96) for the achievement of progression-free survival and overall survival, respectively. Conclusion:In NSCLC drug RCTs, placebo treatment is indicated to generally induce low toxicity in patients by dropout and dose reduction rates and adverse events, although the therapeutic responses could not be precisely determined. The results suggest that under specific circumstances, palliative care which can activate placebo effect may have similar effects as active drugs (such as erlotinib, vandetanib, or pemetrexed) in terms of prolonging survival time.