No abstract

This paper examines the dispute resolution methods available in international institutions, with the ECOWAS as a case study. The research leading to the paper was doctrinal, analytical, and comparative. The doctrinal research approach involved the identification of the principles of law relevant to the subject matter of this paper and determining how and to what extent each of the rules applied to the research subject. The analytical component consisted of well-grounded, reasonable, and logical examination and documentation of the relevant aspects of the key variables in the subject matter of the paper. The research strategies were used to determine the value of the available dispute resolution methods to international organizations, as well as to identify the various ways in which the methods could better serve the needs of the organizations and their beneficiaries.The paper found that in line with the universal United Nations Organization Charter provision aimed at encouraging and ensuring peaceful settlement of disputes, ECOWAS provides for several ADR methods of dispute resolution in addition to armed settlement such as through the ECOMOG. The ECOWAS MediationGuidelines (EMGs) create methodical principles for mediators to become more successful in peaceful resolution of disputes and conflicts. Also, the EMGs stimulate culture-based mediation, preparedness at all stages of mediation, neutrality, gender sensitivity, consent, and impartiality, while ensuring that there is consistency with the ECOWAS and international standards.The ECOWAS emphasis on ADR methods to settle conflicts and disputes should be encouraged and strengthened because the methodsare credible, effective, and efficient among the member-States and their citizens.