Background: Glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists differ in chemical structure, duration of action and in their effects on clinical outcomes. The cardiovascular effects of once-weekly albiglutide in type 2 diabetes are unknown. Methods: We randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease to the addition of once-weekly subcutaneous injection of albiglutide (30 mg to 50 mg) or matching placebo to standard care. We hypothesized that albiglutide would be noninferior to placebo for the primary outcome of first occurrence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. If noninferiority was confirmed by an upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio of less than 1.30, closed-testing for superiority was prespecified. Findings: Overall, 9463 participants were followed for a median of 1.6 years. The primary composite outcome occurred in 338 of 4731 patients (7.1%; 4.6 events per 100 person-years) in the albiglutide group and in 428 of 4732 patients (9.0%; 5.9 events per 100 person-years) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI ], 0.68 to 0.90), indicating that albiglutide, was superior to placebo (P<0.0001 for noninferiority, P=0.0006 for superiority). The incidence of acute pancreatitis (albiglutide 10 patients and placebo 7 patients), pancreatic cancer (6 and 5), medullary thyroid carcinoma (0 and 0), and other serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. Interpretation: In patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, albiglutide was superior to placebo with respect to major adverse cardiovascular events. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; Harmony Outcomes ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02465515.) noninferiority; P = 0.06 for superiority). There seems to be variation in the results of existing trials with GLP-1 receptor agonists, which if correct, might reflect drug structure or duration of action, patients studied, duration of follow-up or other factors.

Women with IBD had a higher rate of voluntary childlessness and fewer children than the general population. These observations are likely attributable to a higher educational achievement and to racial background of the patients rather than to IBD-related reasons. Although contraception use in patients with IBD was lower that in the general population, use was higher after the diagnosis of IBD than before the diagnosis. Contraceptive choices and adoption rates were similar to the general population. Women with CD were more affected by miscarriages after diagnosis with IBD than those with UC.

No abstract

Aims/Introduction: To compare safety and efficacy of the extended-release formulation exenatide once weekly (EQW) vs exenatide twice daily (EBID) for 26 weeks in type 2 diabetes patients from China, India, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Materials and Methods: A randomized, comparator-controlled, open-label study included 681 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled (hemoglobin A1c [HbA 1c ] ! 7 and 11%) with oral antihyperglycemic medications (OAMs). Patients added 2 mg EQW or 10 lg EBID to current OAMs. Safety was re-evaluated 10 weeks after last treatment. Results: EQW was superior to EBID on HbA 1c measures at week 26 (Least-squares mean treatment difference: À0.31% [95% confidence interval À0.49, À0.14%]). More EQW-treated patients achieved target HbA 1c 7.0% (P = 0.003), 6.5% (P < 0.001), or 6.0% (P = 0.003). Fasting serum glucose reductions were greater among EQW-treated patients (P < 0.001). Blood glucose profiles improved in both treatment groups (P < 0.001). Weight loss occurred with both treatments, but was greater with EBID. Adverse events ( ! 10%, either group) were nausea, injection-site induration, dyslipidemia and vomiting. Injection-site induration was more frequent with EQW, whereas nausea, vomiting and hypoglycemia were less frequent. One episode each of major hypoglycemia (EBID) and pancreatitis (EQW) were reported. Conclusion: In this population, EQW and EBID showed efficacious glucose and weight control; safety and tolerability were consistent with observations in non-Asian patients. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (no. NCT00917267). (J Diabetes Invest,