Objective: Compound traditional Chinese medicine (CTCM) with the application of compatibility from multiple active ingredients with multiple-specific targets can achieve a synergistic effect on cancer therapy. This study is aimed to observe the compatibility effects of Aidi injection on the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and to explore the mechanism of CTCM. Methods: Aidi injection is a clinical compound prescription containing Mylabris, Ginseng, Astragalus, and Acanthopanax, which can inhibit tumor growth and induce apoptosis. In this study, the anticancer activity of Aidi injection, as well as its disassembled and combined compositions, had been evaluated by varying levels of polyamine biomarkers on human hepatoma Hep-G2 cells detected using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results: According to the different variations in polyamine levels, it was revealed that Mylabris and Ginseng had an antitumor effect, while Astragalus acted as an assistant and Acanthopanax had weak anticancer activity. The increased level of polyamines in Hep-G2 cells had been found in HL-7702 cells. On combining Mylabris and Ginseng, polyamine levels went close to the normal level, which was even more marked when Astragalus was added. Aidi injection acted like the combination of Mylabris, Ginseng, and Astragalus. Conclusions: This study established a quantitative evaluation of the compatibility effects of Aidi injection based on polyamine biomarkers and evaluated the consistency of its anticancer effect, providing a manner to research the efficacy evaluation of CTCM. Moreover, the correlation between polyamine metabolism and anticancer activity can be used in anticancer drug screening.
Background: Respiratory tract infections (RTI) are common complications of primary nephrotic syndrome (PNS) and influence the outcomes of PNS. The pathogenic spectrum and their susceptibility to antibiotics in RTI change over time, which increases the difficulty of treatment. Objectives: To improve the curative effect of RTI in children with PNS, we conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study in 2740 children with PNS to study the etiologic features of RTI seen in PNS children. Methods: Totally 2740 children with PNS hospitalized during 2010 - 2014 were enrolled in this study. Respiratory specimens were collected for the detection of pathogens using current laboratory diagnostic tests. The cases were divided into community-acquired respiratory tract infection (CARTI) and hospital-acquired respiratory tract infection (HARTI) as well as upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) to analyse the etiologic features. Results: Among 2162 cases of PNS with RTI, 2095 cases were CARTI (96.90%), and 67 cases were HARTI (3.10%). The most common pathogen in CARTI was Coxsackie virus, followed by Mycoplasma pneumoniae, respiratory syncytial virus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae, while the most common pathogen in HARTI also was Coxsackie virus, followed by respiratory syncytial virus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. There was significant difference in the positive rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans between CARTI and HARTI. The distribution of pathogens differed between URTI and LRTI in children with PNS. The positive rates of most pathogens were lower in URTI than URTI. Generally, the isolation rate of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria was relatively low. In CARTI, the sensitive rates of Gram-negative ESBL producing bacteria to carbapenems, amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium, ampicillin/sulbactam, and ciprofloxacin were more than 90.00%, while Gram-positive ESBL producing bacteria were sensitive to glycopeptides, linezolid, macrodantin, mupirocin-HL, and amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium. Conclusions: In children with PNS, the etiology differed between CARTI and HARTI as well as URTI and LRTI. Therefore, it is necessary to differentiate these features for empirical therapy. If the pathogen is bacterial, amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium could be the first choice before sputum culture results are available.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.