The primary aim of the current study is to identify whether there is a significant difference between students' academic achievements and the matching of students' learning styles to the teaching styles of their instructors. Research Methods: This research was designed as a survey study and employing the quantitative research methodology. The participants consisted of 479 students enrolled in a course titled "Introduction to Computers". The Grasha-Riechmann Learning Styles and Teaching Style Inventories were used to identify the students' dominant learning styles and instructors' dominant teaching styles.
This study investigates to what extent Turkish formal complaint letters followed the ‘Problem-Solution Pattern’
(Hoey 1983), and on how the writers expressed their wishes when they explained
their problem and asked the authorities to amend a mistake. The study is based on a corpus of 134 Turkish complaint letters. It
draws upon Flowerdew’s (2008, 2012) approach
to the problem-solution pattern and the role of clause relations in this text pattern.
Results showed that age-old Turkish rhetorical norms led writers’ choice of lexico-grammatical patterns in
reflecting politeness in order to maintain their own and the recipients’ faces. The speech acts (complaint and request) in the
‘Problem and Solution’ parts below were hedged and impersonalized. The Turkish traditional rhetorical formula that was used in the
request does not explicitly ask the reader to do something; in this way, the writers attempt to protect both their own face and
that of the reader.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.