Since the prevalence of heart failure (HF) increases with age, HF is now one of the most common reasons for the hospitalization of elderly people. Although the treatment strategies and overall outcomes of HF patients have improved over time, hospitalization and mortality rates remain elevated, especially in developed countries where populations are aging. Therefore, this paper is intended to be a valuable multidisciplinary source of information for both doctors (cardiologists and general physicians) and pharmacists in order to decrease the morbidity and mortality of heart failure patients. We address several aspects regarding pharmacological treatment (including new approaches in HF treatment strategies [sacubitril/valsartan combination and sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors]), as well as the particularities of patients (age-induced changes and sex differences) and treatment (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes in drugs; cardiorenal syndrome). The article also highlights several drugs and food supplements that may worsen the prognosis of HF patients and discusses some potential drug–drug interactions, their consequences and recommendations for health care providers, as well as the risks of adverse drug reactions and treatment discontinuation, as an interdisciplinary approach to treatment is essential for HF patients.

The aim of this paper is to provide an accurate overview regarding the current recommended approach for antihypertensive treatment. The importance of DNA sequencing in understanding the complex implication of genetics in hypertension could represent an important step in understanding antihypertensive treatment as well as in developing new medical strategies. Despite a pool of data from studies regarding cardiovascular risk factors emphasizing a worse prognosis for female patients rather than male patients, there are also results indicating that women are more likely to be predisposed to the use of antihypertensive medication and less likely to develop uncontrolled hypertension. Moreover, lower systolic blood pressure values are associated with increased cardiovascular risk in women compared to men. The prevalence, awareness and, most importantly, treatment of hypertension is variable in male and female patients, since the mechanisms responsible for this pathology may be different and closely related to gender factors such as the renin–angiotensin system, sympathetic nervous activity, endothelin-1, sex hormones, aldosterone, and the immune system. Thus, gender-related antihypertensive treatment individualization may be a valuable tool in improving female patients’ prognosis.

This study assessed the value of heart rate recovery index (HRRI), a new parameter of an exercise test, as the predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods: Consecutive patients receiving a CRT device were followed up after implantation and every 6 months. An effort test (ET) was quantified by minimum heart rate/maximum heart rate, as well as acceleration and deceleration times. HRRI was calculated as the ratio between acceleration and deceleration time (AT/DT) and compared to outcome. We used logistic regression to assess the predictive value of HRRI for responders and non-responders to CRT. The area under the curve (AUC) was computed to distinguish between positive and negative outcomes. Results: A total of 109 patients (74 men, mean age 63.3 ± 9.8 years) were analyzed; permanent long-term fusion CRT pacing was possible in 65 patients. Patients were assigned to two groups: responders and non-responders (98/11 patients). During a mean follow-up of 36 months, 545 ETs were performed. HRRI was significantly higher in responders versus non-responders (3.16 ± 2 vs. 1.4 ± 0.5, p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value for HRRI as a predictor of CRT response was 1.51 (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve = 0.844). Responders had significant left-ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (LV end-diastolic volume = 240 ± 90 mL vs. 217 ± 89 mL, p < 0.001) and higher LV ejection fraction (26 ± 5.8% vs. 35 ± 8.7%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: HRRI computation during routine ET is useful for the evaluation of responsiveness to CRT.

Background: Assessment of cognitive impairment and the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis are very important especially in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Methods: We included 155 hypertensive patients (84 with AF versus 71 without AF) to identify the premature cognitive impairment, the earliest signs of subclinical atherosclerosis and onset of myocardial dysfunction and to evaluate the type of anticoagulation used, the importance of CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (</>3), age (</>65 years) in hypertensive patients with AF. Results: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) were significantly decreased, and Activities of Daily Living Score (ADL), Geriatric Depression Scale(GDS-15), and intima–media thickness (IMT) were significantly increased in hypertensive patients with AF vs. without AF (p < 0.05). MMSE was significantly decreased, ADL and IMT were significant increased in patients with AF and CHA₂DS₂-VASc>3 and non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants therapy (NOACs)(p < 0.05). Patients with age >65 with AF had higher rates of cognitive impairment (MMSE significant decrease) and a larger IMT (significant increase) versus patients with AF and age <65 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Cognitive impairment is encountered in hypertensive patients having AF. Our conclusions suggest a direct link between cognitive impairment, depression, hypertension, AF, age, CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, type of anticoagulants used, LVEF, cognitive parameters, and IMT. We acknowledge the importance of identifying and preventing cognitive changes.

No abstract