For patients with blood cancers, comorbid mental health disorders at diagnosis likely affect the entire disease trajectory, as they can interfere with disease information processing, lead to poor coping, and even cause delays in care. We aimed to characterize the prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with blood cancers. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, we identified patients 67 years and older diagnosed with lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes between 2000 and 2015. We determined the prevalence of pre-cancer and cancer-associated (CA) depression and anxiety using claims data. We identified factors associated with CA-depression and CA-anxiety in multivariate analyses. Among 75,691 patients, 18.6% had at least one diagnosis of depression or anxiety. Of the total cohort, 13.7% had pre-cancer depression and/or pre-cancer anxiety, while 4.9% had CA-depression or CA-anxiety. Compared to patients without pre-cancer anxiety, those with pre-cancer anxiety were more likely to have subsequent claims for CA-depression (OR 2.98; 95% CI 2.61-3.41). Other factors associated with higher risk of CA-depression included female sex, non-married status, higher comorbidity, and myeloma diagnosis. Patients with pre-cancer depression were significantly more likely to have subsequent claims for CA-anxiety compared to patients without pre-cancer depression (OR 3.01; 95% CI 2.63-3.44). Female sex and myeloma diagnosis were also associated with CA-anxiety. In this large cohort of older patients with newly diagnosed blood cancers, almost one in five suffered from depression or anxiety, highlighting a critical need for systematic mental health screening and management for this population.
Background: Little is known about mental health disorders among patients with hematologic malignancies. As depression and anxiety substantially impair the quality of life of patients with cancer, the Institute of Medicine recommends diagnosis and management of these disorders as an integral part of cancer care (Cancer Care for the Whole Patient, IOM, 2008). Moreover, it has been suggested that non-White patients are less likely to disclose depression and anxiety to physicians due to concerns about stigma, and that physicians also inadequately screen this population (Bell, Annals FM, 2011). We aimed to characterize the prevalence and sociodemographic predictors of pre-diagnostic and cancer-associated (CA) depression and anxiety among patients with hematologic malignancies in the United States. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Patients ≥ 67 years old diagnosed with a hematologic malignancy (lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes) between 2000 and 2015 who died prior to December 31, 2016 were eligible for inclusion. We examined prevalence of pre-diagnostic depression or anxiety, defined as having at least one inpatient or two outpatient Medicare claims for depression or anxiety starting from 24 months to 1 month prior to their blood cancer diagnosis. We also examined prevalence of CA-depression or anxiety, defined as at least one inpatient or two outpatient claims for these conditions between 1 month prior to and 3 months after their blood cancer diagnosis. CA-depression or anxiety were mutually exclusive with pre-diagnostic depression or anxiety respectively. We performed univariable analysis to determine sociodemographic and clinical covariates of CA-depression or CA-anxiety. Next, we fit multivariable logistic regression models to characterize factors independently associated with these two outcomes, adjusting for potential confounders: blood cancer type, age, sex, race, marital status, income, education, comorbidity regardless of univariable significance, and additional variables with p<0.05 in univariable analysis. Results: A total of 64,018 patients were eligible, of which 53.4% had lymphoma, 18.6% myeloma, 18.0% leukemia, and 10.0% myelodysplastic syndromes. Most patients were White (89.6%) and 51.0% were female. Of the entire cohort, 10.6% had pre-diagnostic depression, 4.4% had CA-depression, 7.4% had pre-diagnostic anxiety, and 2.8% had CA-anxiety. Overall, 20.7% of the cohort met our claims-based definition of at least one of these four mental health disorders. In univariable analysis, patients with CA-depression were more likely to have pre-diagnostic anxiety (10.7% vs. 7.3%, p<0.001), have a high comorbidity score (37.5% vs. 31.8%, p<0.001), be female (56.7% vs. 50.6%, p<0.001), and be unmarried (55.3% vs. 52.0%, p=0.001) versus patients without CA-depression. They were also less likely to be non-White (8.8% vs. 10.5%, p=0.005). All associations except marital status remained significant in multivariable analysis (Table 1). In univariable analysis, patients with CA-anxiety were more likely to have pre-diagnostic depression (18.9% vs. 10.4%, p<0.001) and be female (63.2% vs. 50.5%, p<0.001); they were also less likely to be non-White (7.7% vs. 10.5%, p<0.001) compared to patients without CA-anxiety. All associations remained significant in multivariable analysis (Table 2). Conclusions: In this large cohort of patients with blood cancers, more than one in five individuals struggled with depression or anxiety either before their blood cancer diagnosis or as a new mental health syndrome during the three months afterward. These data suggest a critical need for systematic mental health screening and management for this patient population. Moreover, the fact that patients with pre-diagnostic anxiety or depression were at increased risk of developing CA-depression or anxiety respectively emphasizes the importance of additional psychosocial support for patients with pre-existing mental disorders. Finally, our finding that non-White patients were significantly less likely to develop CA-depression or anxiety is provocative, and suggests that either non-White patients with hematologic malignancies have a lower incidence of these disorders or that the mental health concerns of this population are less likely to be routinely captured. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.