To determine the step-by-step kinetics and mechanism of transcription initiation and escape by E. coli RNA polymerase from the λPR promoter, we quantify the accumulation and decay of transient short RNA intermediates on the pathway to promoter escape and full-length (FL) RNA synthesis over a wide range of NTP concentrations by rapid-quench mixing and phosphorimager analysis of gel separations. Experiments are performed at 19 °C, where almost all short RNAs detected are intermediates in FL-RNA synthesis by productive complexes or end-products in nonproductive (stalled) initiation complexes, and not from abortive initiation. Analysis of productiveinitiation kinetic data yields composite second-order rate constants for all steps of NTP binding and hybrid extension up to the escape point (11-mer). The largest of these rate constants is for incorporation of UTP into the dinucleotide pppApU in a step which does not involve DNA opening or translocation. Subsequent steps, each of which begins with reversible translocation and DNA opening, are slower with rate constants that vary more than ten-fold, interpreted as effects of translocation stress on the translocation equilibrium constant. Rate constants for synthesis of 4-and 5-mer, 7-mer to 9-mer and 11-mer are particularly small, indicating that RNAP-promoter interactions are disrupted in these steps. These reductions in rate constants are consistent with the previously-determined 9 kcal cost of escape from λPR. Structural modeling and previous results indicate that the three groups of small rate constants correspond to sequential disruption of incleft, −10 and −35 interactions. Parallels to escape by T7 RNAP are discussed.
Transcription initiation is highly regulated by promoter sequence, transcription factors, and ligands. All known transcription inhibitors, an important class of antibiotics, act in initiation. To understand regulation and inhibition, the biophysical mechanisms of formation and stabilization of the “open” promoter complex (OC), of synthesis of a short RNA–DNA hybrid upon nucleotide addition, and of escape of RNA polymerase (RNAP) from the promoter must be understood. We previously found that RNAP forms three different OC with λPR promoter DNA. The 37 °C RNAP-λPR OC (RPO) is very stable. At lower temperatures, RPO is less stable and in equilibrium with an intermediate OC (I3). Here, we report step-by-step rapid quench-flow kinetic data for initiation and growth of the RNA–DNA hybrid at 25 and 37 °C that yield rate constants for each step of productive nucleotide addition. Analyzed together, with previously published data at 19 °C, our results reveal that I3 and not RPO is the productive initiation complex at all temperatures. From the strong variations of rate constants and activation energies and entropies for individual steps of hybrid extension, we deduce that contacts of RNAP with the bubble strands are disrupted stepwise as the hybrid grows and translocates. Stepwise disruption of RNAP-strand contacts is accompanied by stepwise bubble collapse, base stacking, and duplex formation, as the hybrid extends to a 9-mer prior to disruption of upstream DNA–RNAP contacts and escape of RNAP from the promoter.
In transcription initiation, specific contacts between RNA polymerase (RNAP) and promoter DNA are disrupted as the RNA-DNA hybrid advances into the cleft, resulting in escape of RNAP. From the pattern of large and small rate constants for steps of initiation at λPR promoter at 19°C, we proposed that in-cleft interactions are disrupted in extending 3-mer to 5-mer RNA, −10 interactions are disrupted in extending 6-mer to 9-mer, and −35 interactions are disrupted in extending 10-mer to 11-mer, allowing RNAP to escape. Here we test this mechanism and determine enthalpic and entropic activation barriers of all steps from kinetic measurements at 25°C and 37°C. Initiation at 37°C differs significantly from expectations based on lower-temperature results. At low concentration of the second iNTP (UTP), synthesis of full-length RNA at 37°C is slower than at 25°C and no transient short RNA intermediates are observed, indicating a UTP-dependent bottleneck step early in the 37°C mechanism. Analysis reveals that the 37°C λPR OC (RPO) cannot initiate and must change conformation to a less-stable initiation complex (IC) capable of binding the iNTP. We find that IC is the primary λPR OC species below 25°C, and therefore conclude that IC must be the I3 intermediate in RPO formation. Surprisingly, Arrhenius activation energy barriers to five steps where RNAP-promoter in-cleft and −10 contacts are disrupted are much smaller than for other steps, including a negative barrier for the last of these steps. We interpret these striking effects as enthalpically-favorable, entropically-unfavorable, stepwise bubble collapse accompanying disruption of RNAP contacts.SignificanceTranscription initiation is highly regulated. To understand regulation, mechanisms of initiation and escape of RNA polymerase (RNAP) from the promoter must be understood. RNAP forms a highly-stable open complex (RPO) with λPR promoter at 37°C. From experiments determining effects of temperature on rate constants for each step of RNA synthesis, we find that RPO cannot bind the initiating nucleotides, that the I3 intermediate and not RPO is the initiation complex, and that contacts of RNAP with single-stranded DNA of the discriminator and −10 region and with −35 duplex DNA are disrupted stepwise as the RNA-DNA hybrid moves into the cleft. Evidence is obtained for stepwise bubble collapse and base stacking accompanying disruption of interactions of the single-stranded discriminator and −10 regions with RNAP.
Advances in cryo-electron microscopy have opened up new avenues to structurally define biomolecular assemblies. To arrive at detailed psedoatomic models, it is necessary to employ integrative computational modeling. Here,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.