Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (IHES) is a primary haematological condition characterised by persistent, otherwise unexplained hypereosinophilia sufficient to cause organ damage. Various neurological complications are reported, but very few have mentioned CNS pathology and none has included CNS vasculitis. Our objective here is to report IHES as a new cause of histopathologically confirmed CNS vasculitis. A 39-year-old man presented with a relapsing sub-acute encephalopathy, with severe headaches, confusion and drowsiness, myoclonus, ataxia and papilloedema. He had a history of nephrotic syndrome 18 years earlier, stable for the past 5 years on low-dose corticosteroids and low-dose tacrolimus (2 mg bd); lichen planus, and (15 years previously) aloplecia totalis. On admission, he had a marked peripheral eosinophilia (up to 9.1 × 10(9)/dL), which—it subsequently became clear—had been intermittently present for 16 years. After extensive investigation, biopsies of brain and bone marrow confirmed diagnoses of cerebral vasculitis, with lymphocytic and macrophage (but not eosinophilic) cellular infiltration of blood vessel walls, and IHES. CNS vasculitis can therefore now be added to the list of neurological complications of IHES. A dramatic and sustained neurological improvement, and likewise of the eosinophilia, following treatment with corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide, emphasises the tractability of this newly described form of CNS vasculitis.

SARS-CoV-2 is associated with new-onset neurological and psychiatric conditions. Detailed clinical data, including factors associated with recovery, are lacking, hampering prediction modelling and targeted therapeutic interventions.In a UK-wide cross-sectional surveillance study of adult hospitalised patients during the first COVID-19 wave, with multi-professional input from general and sub-specialty neurologists, psychiatrists, stroke physicians, and intensivists, we captured detailed data on demographics, risk factors, pre-COVID-19 Rockwood frailty score, comorbidities, neurological presentation and outcome. A priori clinical case definitions were used, with cross-specialty independent adjudication for discrepant cases. Multivariable logistic regression was performed using demographic and clinical variables, to determine the factors associated with outcome.

Given the intuitive potential of stem cell therapy and limitations of current treatment options for progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), it is not surprising that patients consider undertaking significant clinical and financial risks to access stem cell transplantation. However, while increasing evidence supports autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) in aggressive relapsing-remitting MS, interventions employing haematopoietic or other stem cells should otherwise be considered experimental and recommended only in the context of a properly regulated clinical study. Understandably, most neurologists are unfamiliar with AHSCT procedures and the specific requirements for quality assurance and safety standards, as well as post-procedure precautions and follow-up. Consequently they may feel ill-equipped to advise patients. Here, we highlight important points for discussion in consultations with patients considering stem cell 'tourism' for MS.