The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the impact of a home-based, personalised reminiscence programme facilitated through an iPad app on people living with dementia and their family carers. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from 15 people living with dementia and 17 family carers from a region of the United Kingdom. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Six key themes emerged related to usability ('It's part of my life now'); revisiting the past ('Memories that are important to me'); home use ('It was homely'); impact on the person living with dementia ('It helped me find myself again'); gains and abilities ('There is still so much inside') and impact on relationships ('It's become very close'). These themes highlighted the impact of the reminiscence experience at an individual and relationship level for people living with dementia and their carers. The reminiscence experience also appeared to facilitate the development of new insights among participants that emphasised abilities and gains rather than disabilities and losses. The significance of personal memories was a core theme although this was not without its challenges, particularly if memories were distressing. The reminiscence experience was differentiated by individual roles. Carers tended to become more relationship-focused, whereas people living with dementia highlighted the significance of learning new skills. The study concluded that individual specific reminiscence supported by an iPad app can have a positive impact on people living with dementia and their carers at an individual and relationship level.

BackgroundDementia is an international research priority. Reminiscence is an intervention that prompts memories and has been widely used as a therapeutic approach for people living with dementia. We developed a novel iPad app to support home-based personalized reminiscence. It is crucial that technology-enabled reminiscence interventions are appraised.ObjectiveWe sought to measure the effect of technology-enabled reminiscence on mutuality (defined as the level of “closeness” between an adult living with dementia and their carer), quality of carer and patient relationship, and subjective well-being.MethodsA 19-week personalized reminiscence intervention facilitated by a program of training and a bespoke iPad app was delivered to people living with dementia and their family carers at their own homes. Participants (N=60) were recruited in dyads from a cognitive rehabilitation team affiliated with a large UK health care organization. Each dyad comprised a person living with early to moderate dementia and his or her family carer. Outcome measurement data were collected at baseline, midpoint, and intervention closure.ResultsParticipants living with dementia attained statistically significant increases in mutuality, quality of carer and patient relationship, and subjective well-being (P<.001 for all 3) from baseline to endpoint. Carers attained nonsignificant increases in mutuality and quality of carer and patient relationship and a nonsignificant decrease in subjective well-being.ConclusionsOur results indicate that individual-specific reminiscence supported by an iPad app may be efficient in the context of early to moderate dementia. A robust randomized controlled trial of technology-enabled personalized reminiscence is warranted.

This paper reports on a study that examines the value of several common usability testing protocols, methods and metrics when used to evaluate the usability of a new personalised reminiscence 'app'. The app, called 'InspireD', is a bespoke app designed to support personalised reminiscence for people living with dementia. The study focused on determining the value of commonly used methods for evaluating usability of apps designed for use by people living with dementia and their caregivers. The study indicated that observation and recording of task completion rates and times produced the most reliable results. The think-aloud methodology was difficult for the people living with dementia and did not produce any reliable data. Thinking-aloud whilst doing a task may have been a distraction since it requires a higher cognitive load. The systematic usability scale score which is derived from a post-test instrument is not reliable, as it had no association with the task completion times.

Aim Peer support worker (PSW) roles are gaining recognition internationally as a valuable component in mental health service delivery. The aim of this study was to explore the views of mental health voluntary sector staff regarding the emergence of this role. Method A qualitative research design was used. A purposive sample was employed. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 10 staff members in various positions in two voluntary mental health organizations. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically. Results Views varied on the PSW role with some participants stating that it was tokenistic, whereas others highlighted the value of its contribution. Participants' expressed concerns regarding professional boundaries and organizational cultural challenges that PSWs may encounter in their role. The provision of reasonable adjustments was recommended as an integral support mechanism. Conclusion Successful integration of the PSW requires careful consideration of the role, the workplace environment and the unique needs of the peer, to prevent the role becoming constrained and diluted. Implications for practice The PSW role may impact the traditional delivery of mental health nursing services. It is therefore essential that nurses are cognizant of these potential challenges to successfully facilitate the integration of PSWs in practice.

Recent studies have focused on the use of technology to support reminiscence but there remains a dearth of research on the health costs and benefits associated with this intervention. The aim of this study was to estimate costs and quality of life associated with a home based, individual specific reminiscence intervention, facilitated by an iPad app for people living with dementia and their family carers, with a view to informing a future cost-effectiveness analysis. Use of community health and social care services, hospital services, prescribed medication and informal caregiving was assessed using an adapted version of the Client and Socio-Demographic Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) at baseline and 3-month follow-up. Quality of life was assessed at baseline, 6-week and 3-month follow-up using the EQ5D, DEMQOL and DEMQOL proxy instruments. Results showed that average health and social care costs were £29,728 per person at baseline (T0) and £33,436 after 3 months (T2). Higher T2 costs were largely accounted for by higher informal caregiving costs. There was an overall increase in health-related quality of life over the duration of the intervention, although there were notable differences in index scores generated by the EQ5D (0.649, 0.652 and 0.719) and DEMQOL instruments (0.845, 0.968 and 0.901). The study concluded that a full cost-effectiveness analysis could incorporate a similar range of cost-categories with minor amendments to the CSRI to improve the accuracy of cost estimation. Furthermore, a larger sample size, randomisation and longer follow-up period are required to allow potential effects of the intervention to be realised and differences between intervention and control groups to be accurately detected.