High quality feedback is known to be essential for learning, yet in higher education it has been highlighted as a problem area in the UK by both the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) and National Student Surveys. Furthermore, a recent study has shown that there is a fault-line between the highly structured guidance system that exists in schools/colleges and the culture of 'independent' learning that is promoted in higher education and suggests that this is a significant barrier to a successful transition. This article reports research to improve the transition for first year undergraduates by providing a structured set of guidance activities as a means of an extended induction into the assessment processes in higher education. The activities are based on the Dialogic Feedback Cycle which encompasses principles of feedback as dialogue, emphasising guidance at the start of, and during an assignment rather than summative written feedback. The intervention was evaluated by means of a questionnaire and supported by focus groups. The questionnaire was administered to a control group and an intervention group. Results showed statistically significant improvements (p<0.05) in students' perceptions of their understanding of assessment tasks, criteria, and confidence at completing assessment tasks and self-regulated learning. KeywordsFeedback, Feedforward, Dialogical Feedback Cycle DFC, Assessment, Self-regulated learning, transition, computing. IntroductionThe transition from school to higher education is increasingly recognised to constitute a crosscultural process 'with potential for substantial problems ' (Kirkpatrick and Mulligan, 2002, 75) and experienced as an 'alien environment' (Askham, 2008). There can be many reasons for such problems and Lawrence (2005) provides a detailed analysis of the complexities of the cultural transition in terms of socio-cultural competencies, university (learning) literacies and selfmanagement. However, a particularly important aspect concerns assessment practices and feedback. Beaumont, O'Doherty and Shannon (2011) identified the substantial difference between the approaches for assessment feedback at school and higher education as a significant barrier to successful transition. Their study of students' experiences in English schools and * Email:Chris.Beaumont@Edgehill.ac.uk Journal of Further and Higher Educationuniversities revealed that both students and teachers used the term 'spoon feeding' to describe the learning process in school, explaining that it aims to deliver high grades. Whilst this may be good for league tables, it leaves many students unprepared for university assessment, which is typically characterised as 'independent learning' (Leese, 2010). Bingham and O'Hara (2007) confirm the difficulty students have in becoming 'autonomous' learners.It is therefore important to explore the effectiveness of approaches that will help students make a successful transition between the two sectors; in short, to scaffold the development of self-regulated learning skills. Ind...
the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.