No abstract

Our results show that paper records are significantly more complete than EPR. This is the case for two different EPRs and three separate sites. We propose additional training to aid data-collection; improving the design of EPRs by investigating factors such as layout and use of forced choice fields.

No abstract

Purpose: To evaluate ophthalmology trainees' perception of their gonioscopy learning experience in the Ophthalmology Specialty Training programme. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional electronic survey was conducted amongst ophthalmology trainees across London Deaneries. The 10 questions survey collected parameters including training grade, previous level of gonioscopy training, confidence in performing the procedure, level of satisfaction with the training formats received, potential barriers and improvements to the training programme. The respondents were also invited to express any additional comments. Results: Fifty-seven complete responses were analysed. Respondents included 25 junior trainees (ST1-3) and 32 senior trainees (ST4-7 and fellow). One fifth of the respondents (11/57) were unconfident in performing gonioscopy, majority being junior trainees (9/11). Over a quarter of the respondents were dissatisfied with the quantity of the gonioscopy training received. Teaching formats such as consultant teaching (mean 8.0), self-directed learning (mean 8.0) and small-group tutorials (mean 7.6) were all well received. Overall, lack of clinical time was considered as the major barrier to gonioscopy training; however lack of training was considered as the major barrier in the low confidence group. Conclusion: This study highlighted ophthalmology trainees' dissatisfaction in the current gonioscopy training curriculum and a lack of confidence in performing the procedure. Appropriate modifications to the Ophthalmology Specialty Training programme could enhance trainees' gonioscopy learning experience.

No abstract