Abstract. The implementation of drought management plans contributes to reduce the wide range of adverse impacts caused by water shortage. A crucial element of the development of drought management plans is the selection of appropriate indicators and their associated thresholds to detect drought events and monitor the evolution. Drought indicators should be able to detect emerging drought processes that will lead to impacts with sufficient anticipation to allow measures to be undertaken effectively. However, in the selection of appropriate drought indicators, the connection to the final impacts is often disregarded. This paper explores the utility of remotely sensed data sets to detect early stages of drought at the river basin scale and determine how much time can be gained to inform operational land and water management practices. Six different remote sensing data sets with different spectral origins and measurement frequencies are considered, complemented by a group of classical in situ hydrologic indicators. Their predictive power to detect past drought events is tested in the Ebro Basin. Qualitative (binary information based on media records) and quantitative (crop yields) data of drought events and impacts spanning a period of 12 years are used as a benchmark in the analysis. Results show that early signs of drought impacts can be detected up to 6 months before impacts are reported in newspapers, with the best correlation-anticipation relationships for the standard precipitation index (SPI), the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) and evapotranspiration (ET). Soil moisture (SM) and land surface temperature (LST) offer also good anticipation but with weaker correlations, while gross primary production (GPP) presents moderate positive correlations only for some of the rain-fed areas. Although classical hydrological information from water levels and water flows provided better anticipation than remote sensing indicators in most of the areas, correlations were found to be weaker. The indicators show a consistent behaviour with respect to the different levels of crop yield in rain-fed areas among the analysed years, with SPI, NDVI and ET providing again the stronger correlations. Overall, the results confirm remote sensing products' ability to anticipate reported drought impacts and therefore appear as a useful source of information to support drought management decisions.
Abstract. We follow a user-based approach to examine how information supports
operational drought management decisions in the Ebro basin and how these can
benefit from additional information such as from remote sensing data. First
we consulted decision-makers at basin, irrigation district and farmer scale
to investigate the drought-related decisions they make and the information
they use to support their decisions. This allowed us to identify the courses
of action available to the farmers and water managers, and to analyse their
choices as a function of the information they have available to them. Based
on the findings of the consultation, a decision model representing the
interrelated decisions of the irrigation association and the farmers was
built. The purpose of the model is to quantify the effect of additional
information on the decisions made. The modelled decisions, which consider the
allocation of water, are determined by the expected availability of water
during the irrigation season. This is currently informed primarily by
observed reservoir level data. The decision model was then extended to
include additional information on snow cover from remote sensing. The
additional information was found to contribute to better decisions in the
simulation and ultimately higher benefits for the farmers. However, the ratio
between the cost of planting and the market value of the crop proved to be a
critical aspect in determining the best course of action to be taken and the
value of the (additional) information. Risk-averse farmers were found to
benefit least from the additional information, while less risk-averse farmers
stand to benefit most as the additional information helps them take better
informed decisions when weighing their options.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.