Trigger point injections are commonly practised pain interventional techniques. However, there is still lack of objective diagnostic criteria for trigger points. The mechanisms of action of trigger point injection remain obscure and its efficacy remains heterogeneous. The advent of ultrasound technology in the noninvasive real-time imaging of soft tissues sheds new light on visualization of trigger points, explaining the effect of trigger point injection by blockade of peripheral nerves, and minimizing the complications of blind injection.

Fibromyalgia is a chronic pain syndrome of unclear pathophysiology. It is believed to be a dysfunction of the CNS, but no definite structural lesion has been identified so far. Despite a number of changes in the diagnostic criteria, diagnosis remains a clinical one. Since the 2011 revision of the IASP definition of neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia has been excluded from the diagnosis of neuropathic pain. More recent studies however found newer evidences of pathophysiology including small fiber neuropathy in patients with fibromyalgia. This may challenge the existing consensus and have implications on future diagnosis and management of this condition.

Although steroid injections are generally considered effective and safe in the treatment of painful condition of limbs, their use in the treatment of chronic back pain is still controversial and serious complications have been reported. More studies on outcome and safety are warranted.

A recent revision in the definition of neuropathic pain has highlighted this condition as a distinct disease entity. More accurate search for a lesion in the somatosensory nervous system as the pain-generating mechanism will help target the treatment by pharmacological agents. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended, with pharmacotherapy supplemented by psychological therapy and physical rehabilitation, and appropriate interventional treatment for selected refractory cases.

Background Prosthetic socket coupling with the residual limb should be comfortable without causing skin breakdown or excessive pressure. However, users report socket discomfort, and there is a scarcity of objective measurements available to assess this feeling of discomfort. Quantifying the specific pressure may enable clinicians and users to determine and improve comfort levels objectively. Objectives (1) To evaluate if a peak pressure reduction assists in resolving wounds, redness, and pain inside prosthetic sockets in people with transtibial amputation. (2) To determine if peak pressures measured inside the prosthetic socket due to external forces could be used to quantify the level of improvement in socket discomfort. Design In this cohort study, we used a pressure sensor to quantify and facilitate adjustments to the prosthetic socket, correlating this information to the userʼs socket comfort. Setting Outpatient clinic in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Participants People (N = 16) with unilateral transtibial lower limb amputation using a prosthesis. Interventions NA. Main Outcome Measures Peak pressure and socket comfort score (SCS). Results The peak pressure value showed a statistically significant reduction across all participants following adjustments at a 50% delta change in pressure (p = .001). This was achieved with a mean number of 2.6 ± 1.4 adjustments per participant. Following the adjustments, the paired t‐test results showed a mean increase between the first SCS and final SCS was 2.6 (p = .001). Conclusion The wound, redness, and pain resolved in 15 of 16 participants regardless of diabetic status following socket adjustments. Although the peak pressures values did not correlate to the SCS score, the reduction in peak pressure saw significant improvement to the SCS. The use of a portable sensor is a fast and efficient means to quantify adjustments inside the prosthetic socket and could potentially be considered as part of future care delivery.