Raf appears to suppress its own activation by a novel feedback loop, such that inhibition is always counterbalanced by reactivation. These observations imply that some agonists reported to trigger the cellular activation of c-Raf might actually be inhibitors of this enzyme, and that compounds which inhibit the kinase activity of Raf might not be useful as anticancer drugs. The binding sites for ZM 336372 and SB 203580 on Raf and SAPK2/p38 are likely to overlap.

ATR is a large, 4300 kDa protein containing a carboxy-terminus kinase domain related to PI-3 kinase, and is homologous to the ATM gene product in human cells and the rad3/MEC1 proteins in yeast. These proteins, together with the DNA-PK, are part of a new family of PI-3 kinase related proteins. All members of this family play important roles in checkpoints which operate to permit cell survival following many forms of DNA damage. We have expressed ATR protein in HEK293 cells and puri®ed the protein to near-homogeneity. We show that pure ATR is a protein kinase which is activated by circular single-stranded, doublestranded or linear DNA. Thus ATR is a new member of a sub-family of PIK related kinases, founded by the DNA-PK, which are activated in the presence of DNA. Unlike DNA-PK, ATR does not appear to require Ku proteins for its activation by DNA. We show directly that, like ATM and DNA-PK, ATR phosphorylates the genome surveillance protein p53 on serine 15, a site which is up-regulated in response to DNA damage. In addition, we ®nd that ATR has a substrate speci®city similar to, but unique from, the DNA-PK in vitro, suggesting that these proteins have overlapping but distinct functions in vivo. Finally, we ®nd that the kinase activity of ATR in the presence and absence of DNA is suppressed by ca eine, a compound which is known to induce loss of checkpoint control. Our results are consistent with the notion that ATR plays a role in monitoring DNA structure and phosphorylation of proteins involved in the DNA damage response pathways.

Checkpoints maintain order and fidelity in the cell cycle by blocking late-occurring events when earlier events are improperly executed. Here we describe evidence for the participation of Chk1 in an intra-S phase checkpoint in mammalian cells. We show that both Chk1 and Chk2 are phosphorylated and activated in a caffeine-sensitive signaling pathway during S phase, but only in response to replication blocks, not during normal S phase progression. Replication block–induced activation of Chk1 and Chk2 occurs normally in ataxia telangiectasia (AT) cells, which are deficient in the S phase response to ionizing radiation (IR). Resumption of synthesis after removal of replication blocks correlates with the inactivation of Chk1 but not Chk2. Using a selective small molecule inhibitor, cells lacking Chk1 function show a progressive change in the global pattern of replication origin firing in the absence of any DNA replication. Thus, Chk1 is apparently necessary for an intra-S phase checkpoint, ensuring that activation of late replication origins is blocked and arrested replication fork integrity is maintained when DNA synthesis is inhibited.

The inhibition of SAPK2a/p38 (a mitogen activated protein (MAP) kinase family member) by SB 203580 depends on the presence of threonine at residue 106. Nearly all other protein kinases are insensitive to this drug because a more bulky residue occupies this site (Eyers et al., 1998). Raf is one of the few protein kinases that possesses threonine at this position, and we show that SB 203580 inhibits c-Raf with an IC 50 of 2 mM in vitro. However, SB 203580 does not suppress either growth factor or phorbol ester-induced activation of the classical MAP kinase cascade in mammalian cells. One of the reasons for this is that SB 203580 also triggers a remarkable activation of c-Raf in vivo (when measured in the absence of the drug). The SB 203580-induced activation of c-Raf occurs without any increase in the GTP-loading of Ras, is not prevented by inhibitors of the MAPK cascade, protein kinase C or phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase, and is not triggered by the binding of this drug to SAPK2a/p38. The paradoxical activation of cRaf by SB 203580 (and by another structurally unrelated c-Raf inhibitor) suggests that inhibitors of the kinase activity of c-Raf may not be e ective as anti-cancer drugs.