We used a multi-method design to determine the quality of technology-enhanced performance-based peer feedback, teacher candidate strategy use, and child behaviors over time. We also explored teacher candidates’ perceived social validity of technology-enhanced performance-based peer feedback. Eleven teacher candidates enrolled in an early childhood certification program and their focus children that were at-risk or identified with disabilities engaged in naturalistic early childhood environments (home, community, and classroom settings). Teacher candidates were grouped by their environmental assignment and reviewed video interactions to provide feedback to their peers. Teacher candidates' quality of feedback changed over time which impacted teacher candidate use of strategies as well as focus child use of skills. Additionally, the teacher candidates perceived the intervention package to be feasible and acceptable. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of promoting special education teacher candidates’ reflective ability through a comprehensive field experience that combined (a) reflecting-on-action through video analysis with (b) reflecting-in-action through bug-in-ear coaching with real-time feedback. First, we implemented two concurrent single case designed studies to examine the functional relation between the comprehensive field experience and teacher candidates’ reflective ability. Second, we used qualitative methodologies to explore teacher candidates’ perceptions of the record, receive, review, reflect, revise comprehensive reflection cycle as a teacher preparation approach. Overall, special education teacher candidates across both cases ( N = 6) improved their reflective ability in relation to engaging in comprehensive reflection activities. Additionally, candidates identified many meaningful benefits of including comprehensive reflection in teacher preparation. Implications and limitations of these findings are discussed.

We used an adapted alternating treatment single-case design to compare the effect of affirmative feedback to affirmative plus suggestive feedback on educators’ use of naturalistic instruction. Three early childhood special educators and a focus child within their preschool classrooms participated. Visual analysis of our data suggest that affirmative plus suggestive feedback produced stronger effects compared to affirmative feedback. Based on these data, faculty and professional development providers should plan to provide their educators with both affirmative and suggestive feedback to strengthen educators’ practice. Implications for practice and research are included.

We used a multiple baseline across strategies design to determine the effect of technology-enhanced performance-based feedback on parent’s use of preventive strategies to address children’s challenging behaviors for two parent–child dyads. A father, mother, and each of their young children participated. We also measured associated child outcomes and parent’s perceptions of the technology-enhanced performance-based feedback intervention. We observed a functional relation between our intervention and parent practice. Although variable, desired child behaviors increased, and challenging behaviors decreased. Finally, parents indicated that they perceived the intervention to be socially valid.