Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) is a key component of the translational machinery and an important modulator of cell growth and proliferation. The activity of eIF4E is thought to be regulated by interaction with inhibitory binding proteins (4E-BPs) and phosphorylation by mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase-interacting kinase (MNK) on Ser209 in response to mitogens and cellular stress. Here we demonstrate that phosphorylation of eIF4E via MNK1 is mediated via the activation of either the Erk or p38 pathway. We further show that expression of active mutants of MNK1 and MNK2 in 293 cells diminishes cap-dependent translation relative to cap-independent translation in a transient reporter assay. The same effect on cap-dependent translation was observed when MNK1 was activated by the Erk or p38 pathway. In line with these findings, addition of recombinant active MNK1 to rabbit reticulocyte lysate resulted in a reduced protein synthesis in vitro, and overexpression of MNK2 caused a decreased rate of protein synthesis in 293 cells. By using CGP 57380, a novel low-molecular-weight kinase inhibitor of MNK1, we demonstrate that eIF4E phosphorylation is not crucial to the formation of the initiation complex, mitogen-stimulated increase in cap-dependent translation, and cell proliferation. Our results imply that activation of MNK by MAP kinase pathways does not constitute a positive regulatory mechanism to cap-dependent translation. Instead, we propose that the kinase activity of MNKs, eventually through phosphorylation of eIF4E, may serve to limit cap-dependent translation under physiological conditions.

The acute-phase reactant rabbit serum amyloid A 3 (SAA3) was identified as the major difference product in Ag-induced arthritis in the rabbit, a model resembling in many aspects the clinical characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in humans. In Ag-induced arthritis, up-regulated SAA3 transcription in vivo was detected in cells infiltrating into the inflamed joint, in the area where pannus formation starts and, most notably, also in chondrocytes. The proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β induced SAA3 transcription in primary rabbit chondrocytes in vitro. Furthermore, rSAA3 protein induced transcription of matrix metalloproteinases in rabbit chondrocytes in vitro. In the human experimental system, IL-1β induced transcription of acute-phase SAA (A-SSA; encoded by SAA1/SAA2) in primary chondrocytes. Similar to the rabbit system, recombinant human A-SAA protein was able to induce matrix metalloproteinases’ transcription in chondrocytes. Further, immunohistochemistry demonstrated that A-SAA was highly expressed in human RA synovium. A new finding of our study is that A-SSA expression was also detected in cartilage in osteoarthritis. Our data, together with previous findings of SAA expression in RA synovium, suggest that A-SAA may play a role in cartilage destruction in arthritis.

No abstract

Antigen receptors of B lymphocytes transmit their activation signal to the cell interior by associating with and activation of specific non-receptor tyrosine kinases. Most of these kinases as well as other cytoplasmic effectors contain at least one Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, known to bind tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins. We examined the binding specificity of SH2 domains from different signaling molecules in B cells and found that each of the SH2 domains tested bound distinct subsets of stimulation-dependent phosphoproteins in vitro. SH2 domains from Src-like tyrosine kinases bound predominantly to the HS1 phosphoprotein. The tandem SH2 domains of the ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase bound to phosphorylated Ig-beta but only weakly to Ig-alpha. Also the SHC-derived SH2 domain formed complexes with the tyrosine-phosphorylated Ig-alpha/beta heterodimer, while the C- and N-terminal SH2 domains of GTPase-activating protein displayed completely different binding preferences. These results suggest that cytoplasmic effector molecules can be recruited to the activated B cell receptor in an SH2-phosphotyrosine-mediated manner. The data also provide a possible explanation for the notion that Ig-alpha and Ig-beta might couple to different biochemical pathways.

No abstract