BACKGROUND The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric was initiated in 2008 to drive quality improvement in children’s surgery. Low mortality and morbidity in previous analyses limited differentiation of hospital performance. METHODS: Participating institutions included children’s units within general hospitals and free-standing children’s hospitals. Cases selected by Current Procedural Terminology codes encompassed procedures within pediatric general, otolaryngologic, orthopedic, urologic, plastic, neurologic, thoracic, and gynecologic surgery. Trained personnel abstracted demographic, surgical profile, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables. Incorporating procedure-specific risk, hierarchical models for 30-day mortality and morbidities were developed with significant predictors identified by stepwise logistic regression. Reliability was estimated to assess the balance of information versus error within models. RESULTS: In 2011, 46 281 patients from 43 hospitals were accrued; 1467 codes were aggregated into 226 groupings. Overall mortality was 0.3%, composite morbidity 5.8%, and surgical site infection (SSI) 1.8%. Hierarchical models revealed outlier hospitals with above or below expected performance for composite morbidity in the entire cohort, pediatric abdominal subgroup, and spine subgroup; SSI in the entire cohort and pediatric abdominal subgroup; and urinary tract infection in the entire cohort. Based on reliability estimates, mortality discriminates performance poorly due to very low event rate; however, reliable model construction for composite morbidity and SSI that differentiate institutions is feasible. CONCLUSIONS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric expansion has yielded risk-adjusted models to differentiate hospital performance in composite and specific morbidities. However, mortality has low utility as a children’s surgery performance indicator. Programmatic improvements have resulted in actionable data.

Background Surgical wound classification has been used in risk-adjustment models. However, it can be subjective and potentially improperly bias hospital quality comparisons. The objective is to examine the effect of wound classification on hospital performance risk-adjustment models. Study Design Retrospective review of the 2011 ACS NSQIP database was conducted for wound classification categories: clean, clean/contaminated, contaminated, and dirty/infected. To assess the influence of wound classification on risk-adjustment, two models were developed for each outcome: one including and one excluding wound classification. For each model, hospital postoperative complications were estimated using hierarchical multivariable regression methods. Absolute changes in hospital rank, correlations of odds-ratios, and outlier status agreement between models were examined. Results Of the 442,149 cases performed in 315 hospitals: 53.6% were classified as clean; 34.2% clean/contaminated; 6.7% contaminated; and 5.5% dirty/infected. The surgical site infection (SSI) rate was highest in dirty/infected (8.5%) and lowest in clean (1.8%) cases. For overall SSI, the absolute change in risk-adjusted hospital performance rank between models including vs. excluding wound classification was minimal (mean 4.5 out of 315 positions). The correlations between odds ratios of the two performance models were nearly perfect (R=0.9976, P<0.0001), and outlier status agreement was excellent (Kappa=0.9508, P<0.0001). Similar findings were observed in models of subgroups of SSI and other postoperative outcomes. Conclusions In circumstances where alternate information is available for risk-adjustment, there appear to be minimal differences in performance models that include vs. exclude wound classification. Therefore, ACS NSQIP is critically evaluating the continued use of wound classification in hospital performance risk-adjustment models.

This study used the prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Transplant pilot database to analyze surgical complications after liver transplantation (LT) in LT recipients from 2017to 2019. The primary outcome was surgical complication requiring intervention (Clavien-Dindo grade II or greater) within 90 days of transplant. Of the 1684 deceased donor and 109 living donor LT cases included from 29 centers, 38% of deceased donor liver recipients and 47% of living donor liver recipients experienced a complication. The most common complications included biliary complications (19% DDLT; 31% LDLT), hemorrhage requiring reoperation (14% DDLT; 9% LDLT), and vascular complications (6% DDLT; 9% LDLT). Management of biliary leaks (35.3% ERCP, 38.0% percutaneous drainage, 26.3% reoperation) and vascular complications (36.2% angioplasty/stenting, 31.2% medication, 29.8% reoperation) was variable. Biliary (aHR 5.14, 95% CI 2.69-9.8, P < .001), hemorrhage (aHR 2.54, 95% CI 1.13-5.7, P = .024) and vascular (aHR 2.88, 95% CI .85-9.7, P = .089) complication status at 30-days post-transplant were associated with lower 1-year patient survival. We conclude that biliary, hemorrhagic and vascular complications continue to be significant sources of morbidity and mortality for LT recipients. Understanding the different risk factors for complications between deceased and living donor liver recipients and standardizing complication management represent avenues for continued improvement.

No abstract

In recent years, laparoscopic surgery has become a matter of growing interest. It has been shown that laparoscopic colectomy is well tolerated and safe for benign disease. However, there is some uncertainty about using this method for malignant disease when curative resection is the aim. These uncertainties mainly consist of spread of cancer to port site, long-term survival, and adequacy of resection. The majority of laparoscopic colectomies are technically assisted procedures in which anastomosis is performed outside the abdomen. However, some surgeons are now performing this surgery totally laparoscopically with the anastomosis performed inside the abdomen. Laparoscopic colectomy is currently practiced with great frequency by general surgeons. Its performance requires a steep learning curve and a large number of cases to obtain proficiency. The indications for laparoscopic colectomy are different from one institution to another. In some institutions all patients with colorectal disease are candidates for laparoscopic colectomy and in others it may be limited to benign disease only. The purpose of this review is to analyze all laparoscopic colectomies performed at our medical center since 1992. We conducted a retrospective chart review of both hospital and clinic charts of patients who underwent colectomies at our hospital. A total of 338 patient charts were reviewed. In a comparison of both laparoscopic (n = 285) and converted (n = 53) methods, the age and operative time were about the same. Age average and operating room time average were similar for both groups. With laparoscopy, there was a 3-day drop in length of hospital stay as well as a 1-day-earlier regaining of bowel function. Hospital cost dropped $5000 average for the laparoscopic colectomy. The conversion rate at our center was 15 per cent. Complication rates were lower in the laparoscopic group. Recurrence of cancer at the port site (0.7%) was no higher than in the converted group (incisional recurrence, 1.8%). We conclude that laparoscopic colectomy does show an improvement in return of bowel function, hospital cost, and shorter hospital stay. Long-term follow-up will be necessary to determine the effectiveness of laparoscopic colon resection for colorectal cancer.