No abstract

Aims: Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel approach to vascular calcium modification that restores vessel compliance allowing effective lesion expansion. In this study we report the capacity for coronary IVL to precipitate ventricular ectopics ("shocktopics") and asynchronous cardiac pacing.Methods and results: This was a retrospective review of all cases of coronary IVL (n=54) undertaken in the Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, between September 2018 and March 2019. The indication for PCI was chronic stable angina in 46.1% (n=26), non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) in 33.3% (n=18) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in 18.5% (n=10) of patients. The incidence of coronary IVL-provoked ventricular capture was 77.8% (n=42). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified heart rate as the only independent predictor of an increased risk of IVL-induced ventricular capture. Patients with a heart rate <65 bpm prior to IVL were sixteen-fold more likely ], p=0.004) to experience events compared to patients with a heart rate ≥65 bpm. "Shocktopic" beat morphology was largely uniform in each patient and appeared dependent on the target lesion location, in keeping with mechano-electric coupling through activation of local stretch-activated cardiomyocyte channels. No adverse clinical events occurred as a result of coronary IVL-induced capture.Conclusions: Coronary IVL with the Shockwave Medical system is associated with a high incidence of "shocktopics" and asynchronous cardiac pacing that is largely dependent on the resting heart rate. There have been no clinical events associated with this phenomenon, but further systematic evaluation is warranted. AFatrial fibrillation BP blood pressure EM electromagnetic ESWL extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy IVL intravascular lithotripsy MI myocardial infarction NSTEACS non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome PCI percutaneous coronary intervention STEMI ST-elevation MI VF ventricular fibrillation VT ventricular tachycardia

Objectives: This study aimed to present a case series of patient treated for stent underexpansion resistant to conventional treatment with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL). Background: Stent underexpansion is a powerful predictor of long-term stent patency and correlates with unfavorable clinical outcomes. This case series demonstrates the utility of IVL in managing stent underexpansion resistant to conventional treatment. Methods: We describe a case series of patients with stent underexpansion due to calcific coronary artery disease treated with IVL. Stent underexpansion was identified as an inability to adequately expand stents with conventional treatment. Only cases that failed to achieve adequate expansion with high-pressure noncompliant balloon inflation were included. Results: Thirteen patients from six institutions have been included in this case series. The average age was 70.25 years with 76.9% of male patients. The average pre-IVL minimal stent area (MSA) was 2.71 mm 2 , which improved to 6.44 mm 2 post-IVL treatment, representing an average MSA gain of 238%. There were no procedural, peri-procedural, or 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event. Conclusion: This case series demonstrates that IVL is a feasible, safe alternative for the management of stent underexpansion due to calcific coronary disease.

Summary Aortic stenosis is the most common valvular lesion requiring intervention and with an ageing population, its burden is likely to increase. Increasing comorbidity and a desire for less invasive treatment strategies has facilitated the expansion of percutaneous aortic valve therapies. Robust clinical trial data are now available to support the role of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients of prohibitive, high and now intermediate surgical risk. The introduction of a Medicare Benefits Schedule reimbursement is likely to see TAVI use grow exponentially in Australia over the next 5 years. Clinical trials evaluating low risk patients may be the final frontier to see TAVI become the standard of care for most patients with severe aortic stenosis.

No abstract