Portuguese parents revealed a tendency to overestimate their child's level of asthma control and a low level of asthma knowledge. Parents' education, psychological disturbance and time since diagnosis were associated with asthma knowledge. Parents' knowledge was not related to the child's asthma outcomes or to their subjective evaluation of asthma severity or symptoms reports. Parents' asthma knowledge deficits, underreporting of symptoms and underestimation of asthma severity, may affect parent-provider communication and impede asthma control.
This study aimed to describe the quality of life of a group of Portuguese children with asthma, to explore the association between health-related quality of life (HRQL), asthma severity, child's characteristics and parental psychopathology. Additionally, the concordance between the children's HRQL self-report and the parents' HRQL proxy was assessed. Fifty children with asthma (7-13 years) and their primary caregiver participated in the study by filling out the DISABKIDS-37 and other self-report questionnaires. Results for the DISABKIDS-37 supported a good internal consistency and associations between the facets and the global score, in the two versions of the questionnaire. Children and their caregivers scored the child's HRQL positively. Parents of children with an asthma diagnosis for a longer period reported better HRQL. The distribution of the HRQL scores in the child's version showed differences across categories of subjective severity rated by children and across categories of asthma control assessed by the physician. The group with uncontrolled asthma obtained lower HRQL scores than the other groups. There was a lack of convergence between self-report and parent's report of HRQL, with the exception of the physical limitation facet. Asthma severity assessed by the child and parental psychopathology explained 28% of the variance in the children's self-rated HRQL. Findings reinforce that children and caregivers' reports are complementary to each other and support the recommendation to use both information sources.
The implementation of an Hib meningitis vaccination program has nearly eliminated Hib meningitis in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. These findings underscore the need to maintain the vaccination in children, with a thorough investigation of suspected cases and reporting of confirmed cases.
Background: Exercise therapy is becoming extremely relevant as a new efficacious intervention in multiple medical fields. Although several clinical trials have reported benefits of exercise therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD), recommendations and prescriptions for its use in clinical practice remain limited. Objectives: To evaluate the methodological quality and publication rate of clinical trials on exercise therapy for PD. Methods: We analyzed all clinical trials assessing exercise therapy for PD registered in the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and the ClinicalTrials.gov registries, from 2000 to 2017. We evaluated the methodological quality of trials using the Cochrane Risk of Bias criteria. Results: A total of 236 clinical trials were identified. Only 70 (29.7%) trials reported their findings, and 61 (25.8%) had results published in scientific journals. Most trials had an unclear risk of bias concerning incomplete and selective outcome reporting and lacked data on the randomization process, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, and outcomes assessors. Aerobic capacity was the most frequent type of exercise intervention. Conclusions: Although a large number of trials on exercise are registered in international portals, the quality of reporting remains suboptimal and only a quarter of trials have their results published in scientific journals. These two factors, in addition to the heterogeneity of the interventions tested and the unsatisfactory reported methodological quality of most trials, compromise the interpretation of study results. Therefore, higher quality clinical trials reports are needed to establish exercise as part of the PD armamentarium.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.