DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:

Past LCD‐TV generations suffered from a poor motion portrayal, causing the blurring of moving objects. Hence, various techniques have been implemented to improve their motion portrayal, of which the widespread introduction of motion compensated picture‐rate conversion in TV systems is an essential part. However, a careful design of such algorithms is critical, as otherwise very annoying artifacts may decrease their value. In this paper, we will give an overview of the key requirements for high quality motion‐compensated picture‐rate conversion, as implemented in state‐of‐the‐art system‐on‐chips, and visually illustrate the impact of individual measures on picture quality.

Abstract-Motion compensated interpolation (MCI) is crucial for motion portrayal improvement of modern displays, and film judder elimination. As MCI complexity grows, subjective optimization becomes cumbersome and elaborate. We present an objective metric that matches perception better than earlier measures and apply it to evaluate recent MCI algorithms.

Abstract— Active‐matrix OLED panels have inherent features that allow a higher‐quality image reproduction than LCD panels, i.e., high‐contrast, fast response time, and the capability to produce locally high peak luminance levels. We demonstrated a 13‐in.‐ink‐jet‐printed active‐matrix polymer‐OLED prototype for TV applications at SID 2004. This prototype is used as a carrier for studying video‐processing algorithms that take full advantage of the specific characteristics of OLEDs. Addressing schemes, gamut conversion, histogram‐based brightness control, and sparkle processing will be discussed.

Motion compensated interpolation (MCI) is crucial for motion portrayal improvement of modern displays, and film judder elimination. As MCI complexity grows, subjective optimization becomes cumbersome and elaborate. We present an objective metric that matches perception better than earlier measures and apply it to evaluate recent MCI algorithms.